A New Perspective on Vacuum-Assisted Closure for the Treatment of Anastomotic Leak Following Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer, Is It Worthy?

被引:16
作者
Maria Jimenez-Rodriguez, Rosa [1 ,2 ]
Araujo-Miguez, Angela [1 ]
Sobrino-Rodriguez, Salvador [1 ]
Heller, Frederick [3 ]
Diaz-Pavon, Jose M. [1 ,2 ]
Bozada Garcia, Juan M. [1 ]
De la Portilla, Fernando [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Virgen del Rocio Univ Hosp, Seville, Spain
[2] Univ Seville, CSIC, IBiS, Seville, Spain
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Inst Salud Carlos III, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Hepat & Digest, Madrid, Spain
关键词
dehiscence; colorectal cancer; anterior resection; vacuum-assisted therapy; RISK-FACTORS; SURGERY; THERAPY; ETVARD;
D O I
10.1177/1553350618771410
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Anastomotic dehiscence is a common complication of anterior resection. In this work, we evaluate the management of the pelvic cavity after low rectal resection using vacuum closure (VAC) with a gastroscope, and we establish factors that determine the success of closure and analyzed the rate of ileostomy closure after leakage was resolved. Patients and Methods. This is a descriptive case series analysis conducted at a tertiary hospital. Twenty-two patients with low colorectal anastomosis leakage or opening of the rectal stump after anterior resection for rectal cancer were included. They were treated with VAC therapy. Results. The total number of endoscopic sessions was 3.1 +/- 1.9 in the anterior resection with anastomosis group and 3.2 +/- 1.8 in the Hartmann group. In 11 patients the therapy was administered in an ambulatory setting. The mean time to healing was 22.3 +/- 14.7 days. Full resolution was achieved in 19 patients (followed-up 1 year). Ileostomy closure was carried out in 5 patients (38.46%) during follow-up. None of these patients showed leakage signs. Statistically significant differences were obtained depending on the onset of therapy, with better results in patients who underwent earlier vacuum-assisted therapy (before the sixth week after initial surgery), P = .041. Conclusions. VAC therapy is an alternative to surgery that can be safely administered in an ambulatory setting. Early administration in the 6 weeks following surgery is an independent predictive factor for successful closure; however, colonic transit was only recovered in a small percentage of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 356
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of endoscopic treatment on healing of anastomotic leaks after anterior resection of rectal cancer
    Chopra, Sascha Santosh
    Huenerbein, Michael
    SURGERY, 2009, 145 (02) : 182 - 188
  • [32] The types of anastomotic leakage that develop following anterior resection for rectal cancer demonstrate distinct characteristics and oncologic outcomes
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Chan Wook
    Yoon, Yong Sik
    Park, In Ja
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (11) : 1533 - 1540
  • [33] Symptomatic anastomotic leakage diagnosed after hospital discharge following low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Matthiessen, P.
    Lindgren, R.
    Hallbook, O.
    Rutegard, J.
    Sjodahl, R.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (07) : E82 - E87
  • [34] Evaluation of Anastomotic Leakages Grading System Following Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
    Huang, Yi-Zhou
    Xu, Lei-Qi
    Wang, Dong-Yang
    Yu, Min-Hao
    Wang, Hao
    Yu, En-Da
    Zhong, Ming
    Cong, Zhi-Jie
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2021, 105 (1-3) : 497 - 506
  • [35] Anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic resection of low and mid rectal cancer
    Shalaby, Mostafa
    Thabet, Waleed
    Rulli, Francesco
    Palmieri, Francesco
    Saraceno, Federica
    Capuano, Ilaria
    Buonomo, Oreste
    Giarratano, Gabriella
    Petrella, Giuseppe
    Morshed, Mosaad
    Farid, Mohamed
    Sileri, Pierpaolo
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2019, 90 (01) : 57 - 67
  • [36] Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Mantzoros, I.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2010, 14 : S39 - S41
  • [37] Clinical manifestations and risk factors of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Yun, Jung-A
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Park, Yoon Ah
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Chun, Ho-Kyung
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 87 (11) : 908 - 914
  • [38] Long term outcome of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Artus, Alice
    Tabchouri, Nicolas
    Iskander, Othman
    Michot, Nicolas
    Muller, Olivier
    Giger-Pabst, Urs
    Bourlier, Pascal
    Bourbao-Tournois, Celine
    Kraemer-Bucur, Aurore
    Lecomte, Thierry
    Salame, Ephrem
    Ouaissi, Mehdi
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [39] The Impact of Anastomotic Leak and Its Treatment on Cancer Recurrence and Survival Following Elective Colorectal Cancer Resection
    Nachiappan, Subramanian
    Askari, Alan
    Malietzis, George
    Giacometti, Marco
    White, Ian
    Jenkins, John T.
    Kennedy, Robin H.
    Faiz, Omar
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 39 (04) : 1052 - 1058
  • [40] Management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) Following Resection for Rectal Cancer
    Rosen, Harald
    Sebesta, Christian G.
    Sebesta, Christian
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (03)