Impact of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy in the supine position on the detection of significant prostate cancer in an inhomogeneous patient cohort

被引:7
作者
Engelhard, Karl [1 ]
Kuehn, Reinhart [2 ]
Osten, Artur [1 ]
Bogner, Katja [1 ]
Dworak, Anton [3 ]
Luebke, Lars [2 ]
Schneider, Florian [1 ]
机构
[1] Krankenhaus Martha Maria, Inst Radiol, Stadenstr 58, D-90491 Nurnberg, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Martha Maria, Urol Klin, Stadenstr 58, D-90491 Nurnberg, Germany
[3] Klinikum Furth, Inst Pathol, Furth, Germany
关键词
MRI control; prostate biopsy; significant cancer; supine position; TARGETED BIOPSY; MRI; ACCURACY; MEN;
D O I
10.3109/21681805.2015.1103782
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the tumour detection rate of magnetic resonance-guided biopsy (MRGB) in the supine position for significant prostate cancer in an inhomogeneous patient cohort. Materials and methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients with a total prostate-specific antigen>4 ng/ml and/or a tumour-suspicious palpable lesion upon digital rectal examination and a cancer-suspicious region in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) underwent MRGB in a standard 1.5 T magnet. Diagnostic MRI was performed in 20 patients at the authors' institute and 12 men at another location. Eight patients were investigated at 3 T and 24 at 1.5 T. Twenty men had prior negative biopsies and 12 were biopsy naive. All biopsies were performed in the supine position using a table-mounted device and an 18 G biopsy gun. Results: The overall tumour detection rate was 53% (17/32). Two cores (median; range 1-4) were extracted. Clinically significant cancers were found in 94% (16/17). None of the patients showed any postbiopsy complications. The prostate volumes of patients with cancer were significantly lower (39.3 ml) than those of men without cancer (49.7 ml). No significant differences were found between the numbers of tumour-positive and tumour-negative collected cores. In a median follow-up of 14 months, no cancer was detected in the negative biopsy group. Conclusion: MRGB in the supine position can be a valuable tool to detect significant prostate cancer, even in a patient cohort with different prebiopsy pathways. The biopsy method could be a reasonable alternative to MRGB in the prone position.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 115
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of the Number of Cores on the Prostate Cancer Detection Rate in Men Undergoing in-Bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Targeted Biopsies
    Subramanian, Naveen
    Recchimuzzi, Debora Z.
    Xi, Yin
    Diaz de Leon, Alberto
    Chen, Heng
    Xie, Donglu
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Costa, Daniel N.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2021, 45 (02) : 203 - 209
  • [32] Risk of upgrading from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology: Is magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy more accurate?
    Xu, Ning
    Wu, Yu-Peng
    Li, Xiao-Dong
    Lin, Min-Yi
    Zheng, Qing-Shui
    Chen, Shao-Hao
    Li, Jun-Feng
    Wei, Yong
    Xue, Xue-Yi
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 9 (19): : 3634 - 3639
  • [33] Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Chaloupka, M.
    Bischoff, R.
    Pfitzinger, P.
    Lellig, E.
    Ledderose, S.
    Buchner, A.
    Schlenker, B.
    Stief, C.
    Clevert, D-A
    Apfelbeck, M.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2019, 73 (01) : 105 - 111
  • [34] Identification of Threshold Prostate Specific Antigen Levels to Optimize the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Biopsy
    Shakir, Nabeel A.
    George, Arvin K.
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Rothwax, Jason T.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Stamatakis, Lambros
    Su, Daniel
    Okoro, Chinonyerem
    Raskolnikov, Dima
    Walton-Diaz, Annerleim
    Simon, Richard
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (06) : 1642 - 1648
  • [35] Precision of multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of clinically significant Prostate Cancer
    Krafft, U.
    Borkowetz, A.
    UROLOGE, 2020, 59 (01): : 72 - 77
  • [36] The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) in the Detection, Evaluation, and Surveillance of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa)
    Patel, Parth
    Wang, Shu
    Siddiqui, Mohummad Minhaj
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 20 (10)
  • [37] MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy: technical features and preliminary results
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Barchetti, Flavio
    Manenti, Guglielmo
    Aversa, Tommaso
    Catalano, Carlo
    Simonetti, Giovanni
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2015, 120 (06): : 571 - 578
  • [38] Clinical Outcome Following Low Suspicion Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Benign Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy to Detect Prostate Cancer
    Boesen, Lars
    Norgaard, Nis
    Logager, Vibeke
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (02) : 310 - 315
  • [39] Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Kim, Michelle M.
    Wu, Shulin
    Lin, Sharron X.
    Crotty, Rory K.
    Cornejo, Kristine M.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh G.
    Feldman, Adam S.
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 40 (10) : 451.e9 - 451.e14
  • [40] The Added Value of Systematic Sampling in In-Bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Lazarovich, Alon
    Drori, Tomer
    Zilberman, Dorit E.
    Portnoy, Orith
    Dotan, Zohar A.
    Rosenzweig, Barak
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (09):