Impact of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy in the supine position on the detection of significant prostate cancer in an inhomogeneous patient cohort

被引:7
|
作者
Engelhard, Karl [1 ]
Kuehn, Reinhart [2 ]
Osten, Artur [1 ]
Bogner, Katja [1 ]
Dworak, Anton [3 ]
Luebke, Lars [2 ]
Schneider, Florian [1 ]
机构
[1] Krankenhaus Martha Maria, Inst Radiol, Stadenstr 58, D-90491 Nurnberg, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Martha Maria, Urol Klin, Stadenstr 58, D-90491 Nurnberg, Germany
[3] Klinikum Furth, Inst Pathol, Furth, Germany
关键词
MRI control; prostate biopsy; significant cancer; supine position; TARGETED BIOPSY; MRI; ACCURACY; MEN;
D O I
10.3109/21681805.2015.1103782
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the tumour detection rate of magnetic resonance-guided biopsy (MRGB) in the supine position for significant prostate cancer in an inhomogeneous patient cohort. Materials and methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients with a total prostate-specific antigen>4 ng/ml and/or a tumour-suspicious palpable lesion upon digital rectal examination and a cancer-suspicious region in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) underwent MRGB in a standard 1.5 T magnet. Diagnostic MRI was performed in 20 patients at the authors' institute and 12 men at another location. Eight patients were investigated at 3 T and 24 at 1.5 T. Twenty men had prior negative biopsies and 12 were biopsy naive. All biopsies were performed in the supine position using a table-mounted device and an 18 G biopsy gun. Results: The overall tumour detection rate was 53% (17/32). Two cores (median; range 1-4) were extracted. Clinically significant cancers were found in 94% (16/17). None of the patients showed any postbiopsy complications. The prostate volumes of patients with cancer were significantly lower (39.3 ml) than those of men without cancer (49.7 ml). No significant differences were found between the numbers of tumour-positive and tumour-negative collected cores. In a median follow-up of 14 months, no cancer was detected in the negative biopsy group. Conclusion: MRGB in the supine position can be a valuable tool to detect significant prostate cancer, even in a patient cohort with different prebiopsy pathways. The biopsy method could be a reasonable alternative to MRGB in the prone position.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 115
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score
    Osses, Daniel F.
    van Asten, Joost J.
    Kieft, Gerard J.
    Tijsterman, Jasper D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [2] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Present and Future
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 16 (01) : 90 - 98
  • [3] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Biopsy in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    Kinnaird, Adam
    Yerram, Nitin K.
    O'Connor, Luke
    Brisbane, Wayne
    Sharma, Vidit
    Chuang, Ryan
    Jayadevan, Rajiv
    Ahdoot, Michael
    Daneshvar, Michael
    Priester, Alan
    Delfin, Merdie
    Tran, Elizabeth
    Barsa, Danielle E.
    Sisk, Anthony
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Felker, Ely
    Raman, Steve
    Kwan, Lorna
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (04) : 823 - 831
  • [4] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer
    Chaloupka, Michael
    Apfelbeck, Maria
    Pfitzinger, Paulo
    Bischoff, Robert
    Lellig, Ekaterina
    Rath, Lukas
    Schlenker, Boris
    Stief, Christian G.
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    RADIOLOGE, 2020, 60 (Suppl 1): : 63 - 69
  • [5] Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy-A review of literature
    Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    Roof, Shannon
    Rogers, Travis
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 8 (01) : 105 - 116
  • [6] Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transperineal prostate biopsy
    Chen, Jie
    Lin, Zhengyu
    Chen, Jin
    Lin, Qingfeng
    Chen, Jian
    Yan, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (02) : 394 - 397
  • [7] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    George, Arvin K.
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Beecher, Karin
    Vira, Manish A.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Siegel, David N.
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06) : 1749 - 1754
  • [8] Direct magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy of the prostate: lessons learned in establishing a regional referral center
    Addicott, Benjamin
    Foster, Bryan R.
    Johnson, Chenara
    Fung, Alice
    Amling, Christopher L.
    Coakley, Fergus V.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 395 - 405
  • [9] Prognostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy in defining prostate cancer anterior lesions
    Porreca, Angelo
    Bianchi, Federico Mineo
    Salvaggio, Antonio
    D'Agostino, Daniele
    Del Rosso, Alessandro
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Corsi, Paolo
    Colicchia, Michele
    Barbaresi, Umberto
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Giampaoli, Marco
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Palmer, Katie
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Maggi, Martina
    Ferro, Matteo
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    De Berardinis, Ettore
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (05) : 1473 - 1479
  • [10] Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score
    Daniël F. Osses
    Joost J. van Asten
    Gerard J. Kieft
    Jasper D. Tijsterman
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 207 - 212