Digital X-ray radiogrammetry: a new appendicular bone densitometric method with high precision

被引:83
作者
Jorgensen, JT
Andersen, PB
Rosholm, A
Bjarnason, NH
机构
[1] Pronosco AS, DK-2950 Vedbaek, Denmark
[2] Ctr Clin & Basic Res, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Ctr Clin & Basic Res, DK-2750 Ballerup, Denmark
来源
CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY | 2000年 / 20卷 / 05期
关键词
BMD; DXR; monitoring; osteoporosis; precision;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2281.2000.00268.x
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
The precision of any given method for measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) is important in relation to the interpretation of repeated measurements over time, e.g. to monitor the course of suspected osteoporosis or follow the effect of therapy. In the present study a new bone densitometer using the digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) method (Pronosco X-posure System(TM)) is investigated with respect to its short-term precision. The study was carried out on two groups of females, one consisting of 20 women between the ages of 30 and 40, and the other of 20 post-menopausal women above the age of 64. The mean age of the premenopausal women was 35.2 years and the mean DXR BMD was 0.578 g cm(-2). The mean age of the post-menopausal women was 68.2 years and the mean DXR BMD was 0.489 g cm(-2). The short-term precision of the two groups was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV%) and corresponding 90% confidence intervals. The coefficient of variation in the premenopausal group was 0.68% with a 90% confidence interval of 0.57%-0.83%. The coefficient of variation in the postmenopausal group was 0.61% with a 90% confidence interval of 0.52-0.75%. It can be concluded from the present study that the short-term in vivo precision error of the DXR method is low in both pre- and post-menopausal women. When the results of the study are compared to data reported in the literature, the performance of the DXR method seems to be at least equivalent with peripheral DXA.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 335
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Computed radiographic absorptiometry and morphometry in the assessment of postmenopausal bone loss [J].
Adami, S ;
Zamberlan, N ;
Gatti, D ;
Zanfisi, C ;
Braga, V ;
Broggini, M ;
Rossini, M .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 6 (01) :8-13
[2]  
Black DM, 1999, J BONE MINER RES, V14, pS252
[3]   A new perspective on the causal influence of soft tissue composition on DXA-measured in vivo bone mineral density [J].
Bolotin, HH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1998, 13 (11) :1739-1746
[4]   AUTOMATED COMPUTERIZED RADIOGRAMMETRY OF THE 2ND METACARPAL AND ITS CORRELATION WITH ABSORPTIOMETRY OF THE FOREARM AND SPINE [J].
DERISQUEBOURG, T ;
DUBOIS, P ;
DEVOGELAER, JP ;
MEYS, E ;
DUQUESNOY, B ;
DEDEUXCHAISNES, CN ;
DELCAMBRE, B ;
MARCHANDISE, X .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 54 (06) :461-465
[5]  
FOX KM, 1995, J BONE MINER RES, V10, P1930
[6]   DXA longitudinal quality control: A comparison of inbuilt quality assurance, visual inspection, multi-rule Shewhart charts and Cusum analysis [J].
Garland, SW ;
Lees, B ;
Stevenson, JC .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 7 (03) :231-237
[7]   ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF PRECISION ERRORS - HOW TO MEASURE THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF BONE DENSITOMETRY TECHNIQUES [J].
GLUER, CC ;
BLAKE, G ;
LU, Y ;
BLUNT, BA ;
JERGAS, M ;
GENANT, HK .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (04) :262-270
[8]  
GRAMPP S, 1995, J BONE MINER RES, V10, P1566
[9]   Measurement of forearm bone mineral density:: Comparison of precision of five different instruments [J].
Heilmann, P ;
Wüster, C ;
Prolingheuer, C ;
Götz, M ;
Ziegler, R .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 62 (05) :383-387
[10]  
Kanis JA, 1996, TXB OSTEOPOROSIS, P71