The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach

被引:27
作者
Brichetto, Giampaolo [1 ,2 ]
Bragadin, Margherita Monti [1 ,2 ]
Fiorini, Samuele [3 ]
Battaglia, Mario Alberto [4 ]
Konrad, Giovanna [2 ]
Ponzio, Michela [1 ]
Pedulla, Ludovico [1 ]
Verri, Alessandro [3 ]
Barla, Annalisa [3 ]
Tacchino, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Italian Multiple Sclerosis Fdn, Dept Res, Genoa, Italy
[2] AISM Rehabil Ctr Liguria, Genoa, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, Dept Informat Bioengn Robot & Syst Engn, Genoa, Italy
[4] Univ Siena, Dept Life Sci, Siena, Italy
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Disease course; Disease prediction; Patient-reported outcome; Machine learning; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1007/s10072-019-04093-x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Machine learning (ML) applied to patient-reported (PROs) and clinical-assessed outcomes (CAOs) could favour a more predictive and personalized medicine. Our aim was to confirm the important role of applying ML to PROs and CAOs of people with relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) form of multiple sclerosis (MS), to promptly identifying information useful to predict disease progression. For our analysis, a dataset of 3398 evaluations from 810 persons with MS (PwMS) was adopted. Three steps were provided: course classification; extraction of the most relevant predictors at the next time point; prediction if the patient will experience the transition from RR to SP at the next time point. The Current Course Assignment (CCA) step correctly assigned the current MS course with an accuracy of about 86.0%. The MS course at the next time point can be predicted using the predictors selected in CCA. PROs/CAOs Evolution Prediction (PEP) followed by Future Course Assignment (FCA) was able to foresee the course at the next time point with an accuracy of 82.6%. Our results suggest that PROs and CAOs could help the clinician decision-making in their practice.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 462
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Landscape of MS patient cohorts and registries: Recommendations for maximizing impact [J].
Bebo, Bruce F. ;
Fox, Robert J. ;
Lee, Karen ;
Utz, Ursula ;
Thompson, Alan J. .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (05) :579-586
[2]   Model-based machine learning [J].
Bishop, Christopher M. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2013, 371 (1984)
[3]   Effect of Size and Heterogeneity of Samples on Biomarker Discovery: Synthetic and Real Data Assessment [J].
Di Camillo, Barbara ;
Sanavia, Tiziana ;
Martini, Matteo ;
Jurman, Giuseppe ;
Sambo, Francesco ;
Barla, Annalisa ;
Squillario, Margherita ;
Furlanello, Cesare ;
Toffolo, Gianna ;
Cobelli, Claudio .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (03)
[4]   Imaging Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis [J].
Filippi, M. ;
Agosta, F. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 31 (04) :770-788
[5]  
Fiorini Samuele., 2017, Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference, P112
[6]  
Giovannoni G, 2017, NEURODEGENER DIS MAN, V7, DOI 10.2217/nmt-2017-0035
[7]  
Lejbkowicz I, 2012, EXPERT REV NEUROTHER, V12, P343, DOI [10.1586/ern.11.161, 10.1586/ERN.11.161]
[8]   Translation towards personalized medicine in Multiple Sclerosis [J].
Miller, Ariel ;
Avidan, Nili ;
Tzunz-Henig, Noa ;
Glass-Marmor, Lea ;
Lejbkowicz, Izabella ;
Pinter, Ron Y. ;
Paperna, Tamar .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 274 (1-2) :68-75
[9]  
Platform EMS, 2018, REC REH SERV PERS MU
[10]   Integrating different data types by regularized unsupervised multiple kernel learning with application to cancer subtype discovery [J].
Speicher, Nora K. ;
Pfeifer, Nico .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 31 (12) :268-275