Fighting post-truth using natural language processing: A review and open challenges

被引:62
作者
Saquete, Estela [1 ]
Tomas, David [1 ]
Moreda, Paloma [1 ]
Martinez-Barco, Patricio [1 ]
Palomar, Manuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alicante, Dept Software & Comp Syst, Apdo Correos 99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
关键词
Natural language processing; Fake news; Post-truth; Deception detection; Automatic fact-checking; Clickbait detection; Stance detection; Credibility; Human language technologies; Applied computing; Document management and text processing; Document capture; Document analysis; SOCIAL MEDIA; PREDICTING DECEPTION; DETECTING DECEPTION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; CREDIBILITY; NEWS; INFORMATION; FACT; CUES; MOTIVATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112943
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Post-truth is a term that describes a distorting phenomenon that aims to manipulate public opinion and behavior. One of its key engines is the spread of Fake News. Nowadays most news is rapidly disseminated in written language via digital media and social networks. Therefore, to detect fake news it is becoming increasingly necessary to apply Artificial Intelligence (Al) and, more specifically Natural Language Processing (NLP). This paper presents a review of the application of AI to the complex task of automatically detecting fake news. The review begins with a definition and classification of fake news. Considering the complexity of the fake news detection task, a divide-and-conquer methodology was applied to identify a series of subtasks to tackle the problem from a computational perspective. As a result, the following subtasks were identified: deception detection; stance detection; controversy and polarization; automated fact checking; clickbait detection; and, credibility scores. From each subtask, a PRISMA compliant systematic review of the main studies was undertaken, searching Google Scholar. The various approaches and technologies are surveyed, as well as the resources and competitions that have been involved in resolving the different subtasks. The review concludes with a roadmap for addressing the future challenges that have emerged from the analysis of the state of the art, providing a rich source of potential work for the research community going forward. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 168 条
[1]  
Abdolahi M, 2016, 2016 EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE TECHNOLOGY (IKT), P1, DOI 10.1109/IKT.2016.7777794
[2]   CredSaT: Credibility ranking of users in big social data incorporating semantic analysis and temporal factor [J].
Abu-Salih, Bilal ;
Wongthongtham, Pornpit ;
Chan, Kit Yan ;
Zhu, Dengya .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2019, 45 (02) :259-280
[3]  
Almela Angela., 2012, Workshop on Computational Approaches to Deception Detection, P15
[4]   A Credibility Assessment Model for Online Social Network Content [J].
Alrubaian, Majed ;
Al-Qurishi, Muhammad ;
Al-Rakhami, Mabrook ;
Alamri, Atif .
FROM SOCIAL DATA MINING AND ANALYSIS TO PREDICTION AND COMMUNITY DETECTION, 2017, :61-77
[5]   Reputation-based credibility analysis of Twitter social network users [J].
Alrubaian, Majed ;
Al-Qurishi, Muhammad ;
Al-Rakhami, Mabrook ;
Hassan, Mohammad Mehedi ;
Alamri, Atif .
CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2017, 29 (07)
[6]  
Amoros M., 2018, Fake news: la verdad de las noticias falsas
[7]   We Used Neural Networks to Detect Clickbaits: You Won't Believe What Happened Next! [J].
Anand, Ankesh ;
Chakraborty, Tanmoy ;
Park, Noseong .
ADVANCES IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, ECIR 2017, 2017, 10193 :541-547
[8]  
[Anonymous], P 2017 EMNLP WORKSH
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ABS170703264 CORR
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2016, STAT AUT FACTCH