Agrobiodiversity Under Different Property Regimes

被引:12
|
作者
Timmermann, Cristian [1 ]
Robaey, Zoe [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Invest Filosof, Circuito Maestro Mario de la Cueva S-N, Coyoacan, DF, Mexico
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Dept Values Technol & Innovat, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Crop genetic resources; State sovereignty; Common heritage of humankind; Temporary exclusivity; Sustainable agriculture; Seeds; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; COMMON HERITAGE; BIODIVERSITY; RIGHTS; CONSERVATION; AGROECOLOGY; COMMODIFICATION; AGRICULTURE; SOVEREIGNTY; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1007/s10806-016-9602-2
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Having an adequate and extensively recognized resource governance system is essential for the conservation and sustainable use of crop genetic resources in a highly populated planet. Despite the widely accepted importance of agrobiodiversity for future plant breeding and thus food security, there is still pervasive disagreement at the individual level on who should own genetic resources. The aim of the article is to provide conceptual clarification on the following concepts and their relation to agrobiodiversity stewardship: open access, commons, private property, state property and common heritage of humankind. After presenting each property regime, we will examine whether and how these incentivize the conservation, improvement and sharing of crop genetic resources, and conclude by defending a mixed property regime.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 303
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agrobiodiversity Under Different Property Regimes
    Cristian Timmermann
    Zoë Robaey
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2016, 29 : 285 - 303
  • [2] Assessment of yeast diversity in soils under different management regimes
    Yurkov, A. M.
    Kemler, M.
    Begerow, D.
    FUNGAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 5 (01) : 24 - 35
  • [3] Spatiotemporal variation of plant diversity on ditch banks under different management regimes
    Leng, Xin
    Musters, C. J. M.
    de Snoo, Geert R.
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2011, 12 (01) : 38 - 46
  • [4] Mapping agrobiodiversity in Europe: Different indicators, different priority areas
    Matthies, Antonia E.
    Fayet, Catherine M. J.
    O'Connor, Louise M. J.
    Verburg, Peter H.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 154
  • [5] Subsistence under the canopy: Agrobiodiversity's contributions to food and nutrition security amongst coffee communities in Chiapas, Mexico
    Fernandez, Margarita
    Mendez, V. Ernesto
    AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2019, 43 (05) : 579 - 601
  • [6] Heterogeneous public preference for REDD plus projects under different forest management regimes
    Rakatama, Ari
    Pandit, Ram
    Iftekhar, Sayed
    Ma, Chunbo
    LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 78 : 266 - 277
  • [7] Acoustic region workflow for efficient comparison of soundscapes under different invasive mammals' management regimes
    Campos, Ivan Braga
    Fewster, Rachel
    Landers, Todd
    Truskinger, Anthony
    Towsey, Michael
    Roe, Paul
    Lee, William
    Gaskett, Anne
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 68
  • [8] Inefficiency and common property regimes
    Fuentes-Castro, Daniel
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (06) : 1740 - 1748
  • [9] Cultivated Land Use Benefits Under State and Collective Agrarian Property Regimes in China
    Li, Quanfeng
    Hu, Shougeng
    Du, Guoming
    Zhang, Chuanrong
    Liu, Yansui
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (01)
  • [10] Property as Process: How Innovation Markets Select Innovation Regimes
    Barnett, Jonathan M.
    YALE LAW JOURNAL, 2009, 119 (03) : 384 - +