The decision-making processes and preferences of older Australians purchasing home support services: An explorative inquiry using a "think-aloud" technique

被引:2
作者
Rahja, Miia [1 ]
Laver, Kate [1 ]
Phillipson, Lyn [2 ]
Comans, Tracy [3 ]
Crotty, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Flinders Hlth & Med Res Inst, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Australian Hlth Serv Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
aged care spending; consumers choice; decision making; healthcare; home care packages; CONSUMER-DIRECTED CARE; CASH-FOR-CARE; CHOICE; ELDERCARE;
D O I
10.1002/ajs4.170
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Consumer-directed care (CDC) programmes, in principle, provide consumers with choices around who provides care services to them, what services and when. However, literature around consumer behaviour of older adults, especially concerning the factors that may support home care choices, is sparse. The purpose of this study was to understand the decision-making processes and spending preferences of community-dwelling seniors assessed eligible for CDC home care services. We completed an explorative inquiry using a "think-aloud" technique with eligible consumers in South Australia. The inquiry had two components. First, consumers used imitation money to simulate the purchase of home care supports while talking out loud their decision-making processes. Then, semi-structured interviews were completed to identify underlying thoughts that informed the decisions made and spending preferences. Fifteen consumers, mean age 82 years (range 70-94), participated. The most frequently prioritised choice was domestic assistance. However, choices were made based on a perceived hierarchy of need (due to limits placed on available budgets for care). Interview data revealed that the decision making and service preferences were also based on limited knowledge about what was available. Consumers revealed perceived value in purchasing expert advice to guide their choices and preference for relational not transactional service delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 387
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Aged Care Financing Authority, 2018, 6 ACFA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, HLTH BEHAV THEORY RE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Assessment Report on Humulus Lupulus L. Flos, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, LIV LONG LIV BETT
[5]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative research in psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[6]  
Charters E., 2003, BROCK ED J, V12, P68, DOI [10.26522/BROCKED.V12I2.38, DOI 10.26522/BROCKED.V12I2.38]
[7]  
Commonwealth of Australia, 2013, MY AG CAR
[8]   Similar and Yet So Different: Cash-for-Care in Six European Countries' Long-Term Care Policies [J].
Da Roit, Barbara ;
Le Bihan, Blanche .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2010, 88 (03) :286-309
[9]  
Department of Health Australia, 2017, YOUR GUID HOM CAR PA
[10]   Manoeuvring challenging demands: care managers, the Free Choice System and older users of home care services with reduced decision-making capacity [J].
Duner, Anna ;
Gustafsson, Gerd .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE AND CARING, 2020, 4 (04) :479-495