Is immunonutrition superior to standard enteral nutrition in reducing postoperative complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose: Perioperative enteral nutrition supports are recommended in esophagus cancer patients. Immunonutrition contains immuno-enhancing nutrients in addition to standard formula. These new nutrients are thought to be efficacious in reducing inflammatory response and improving postoperative immune response and they have been proved to be better than standard enteral nutrition in reducing postoperative complications in gastric cancer. However, if it would lead to a better clinical outcome in patients undergoing esophagectomy remains controversial. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in the online database of PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The relevant studies were screened out of the results by reading titles and abstracts. Then, we read the full-texts to finally confirm the studies included in this meta-analysis. Results: Six randomized controlled trials having enrolled 638 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis didn't show statistically significant difference between immunonutrition group and standard nutrition group in reducing postoperative complications. Conclusions: The postoperative complications are comparable between immunonutrition and the standard enteral nutrition in patients undergoing esophagectomy, but its value in severe malnutrition patients is undetermined, whereas the high tolerance and other advantages brought by the immunonutrition should not be overlooked and need to be further proved.