United States Population-Based Estimates of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Symptom and Functional Status Reference Values for Individuals With Cancer

被引:151
作者
Jensen, Roxanne E. [1 ]
Potosky, Arnold L. [1 ]
Moinpour, Carol M. [3 ]
Lobo, Tania [1 ]
Cella, David [4 ]
Hahn, Elizabeth A. [4 ]
Thissen, David [5 ]
Smith, Ashley Wilder [7 ]
Ahn, Jaeil [2 ]
Luta, George [1 ,2 ]
Reeve, Bryce B. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Canc Prevent & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, 3300 Whitehaven St NW,Ste 4100, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[7] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES; PROMIS MEASURES; HEALTH; TRIALS; GENERALIZABILITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; SURVEILLANCE; PREVALENCE; INTERVIEW;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2016.71.4410
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeTo estimate cancer population-based reference values in the United States for eight PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) domains by age and stage of disease.Patients and MethodsFor the Measuring Your Health (MY-Health) study, persons newly diagnosed with cancer (prostate, colorectal, non-small-cell lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast, uterine, or cervical) from 2010 to 2012 (N = 5,284) were recruited through the National Cancer Institute's SEER Program. Participants were mailed surveys 6 to 13 months after diagnosis. Raking by race/ethnicity, age, and stage generated weighted average PROMIS scores for pain interference, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, physical function, ability to participate in social roles, and cognitive function. PROMIS measures are standardized to a T-score metric, with a score of 50 representing the general US population mean. Clinically meaningful differences were defined as a 3-point difference in scores.ResultsSeveral reference values (means) for patients with cancer were worse than the general United States population norms of 50. These include pain interference (52.4), fatigue (52.2), and physical function (44.1). Reference values were highest (ie, showed greatest symptom burden) in lung cancer (pain interference, 55.5; fatigue, 57.3; depression, 51.4) and cervical cancer (anxiety, 53.2; sleep disturbance, 53.4). Reference values for patients age 65 to 84 years reported lower sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression, and better cognitive function than younger patients. Cancer reference values were poorer among those with advanced disease compared with patients with limited or no evidence of disease, specifically physical function (41.1 v 46.6, respectively), fatigue (55.8 v 50.2, respectively), and pain interference (55.2 v 50.9, respectively).ConclusionIn a large, population-based sample of patients with recently diagnosed cancer, we observed symptom severity and functional deficits by age, stage, and cancer type consistent with the expected impact of cancer diagnosis and treatment. These United States cancer reference values can help facilitate interpretation of the PROMIS domain scores in research studies or in clinical applications that measure and evaluate the symptom and functional burden patients with cancer experience after initial treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1913 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SEER PROGR RES DAT 1
[2]   Recommendations for Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Clinical Comparative Effectiveness Research in Adult Oncology [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Mullins, C. Daniel ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Smith, Mary Lou ;
Coons, Stephen Joel ;
Sloan, Jeff ;
Wenzel, Keith ;
Chauhan, Cynthia ;
Eppard, Wayland ;
Frank, Elizabeth S. ;
Lipscomb, Joseph ;
Raymond, Stephen A. ;
Spencer, Merianne ;
Tunis, Sean .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (34) :4249-4255
[3]   A gerontologic perspective on cancer and aging [J].
Blank, Thomas O. ;
Bellizzi, Keith M. .
CANCER, 2008, 112 (11) :2569-2576
[4]   ADAPTIVE EAP ESTIMATION OF ABILITY IN A MICROCOMPUTER ENVIRONMENT [J].
BOCK, RD ;
MISLEVY, RJ .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1982, 6 (04) :431-444
[5]   General population and cancer patient norms for the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) [J].
Brucker, PS ;
Yost, K ;
Cashy, J ;
Webster, K ;
Cella, D .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2005, 28 (02) :192-211
[6]   Setting standards for severity of common symptoms in oncology using the PROMIS item banks and expert judgment [J].
Cella, David ;
Choi, Seung ;
Garcia, Sofia ;
Cook, Karon F. ;
Rosenbloom, Sarah ;
Lai, Jin-Shei ;
Tatum, Donna Surges ;
Gershon, Richard .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (10) :2651-2661
[7]   The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008 [J].
Cella, David ;
Riley, William ;
Stone, Arthur ;
Rothrock, Nan ;
Reeve, Bryce ;
Yount, Susan ;
Amtmann, Dagmar ;
Bode, Rita ;
Buysse, Daniel ;
Choi, Seung ;
Cook, Karon ;
DeVellis, Robert ;
DeWalt, Darren ;
Fries, James F. ;
Gershon, Richard ;
Hahn, Elizabeth A. ;
Lai, Jin-Shei ;
Pilkonis, Paul ;
Revicki, Dennis ;
Rose, Matthias ;
Weinfurt, Kevin ;
Hays, Ron .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 63 (11) :1179-1194
[8]   Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: Evaluating and enhancing the payoff to decision making [J].
Clauser, Steven B. ;
Ganz, Patricia A. ;
Lipscomb, Joseph ;
Reeve, Bryce B. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (32) :5049-5050
[9]   Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Detmar, SB ;
Muller, MJ ;
Schornagel, JH ;
Wever, LDV ;
Aaronson, NK .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (23) :3027-3034
[10]   How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients' and oncologists' preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues [J].
Detmar, SB ;
Aaronson, NK ;
Wever, LDV ;
Muller, M ;
Schornagel, JH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (18) :3295-3301