Separate and joint effects of medium type on consumer responses: a comparison of television, print, and the Internet

被引:111
作者
Dijkstra, M [1 ]
Buijtels, HEJJM [1 ]
van Raaij, WF [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Dept Mkt Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
single-medium campaign; multiple-media campaign; affective responses; cognitive responses; conative responses;
D O I
10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00105-X
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study explores the effects on consumer responses of single- and multiple-media campaigns consisting of television, print, and the Internet. Multiple media in a campaign are expected to have synergy effects. We examine whether a complementarity effect is present in multiple-media campaigns related to media differences in evoking cognitive, affective, and conative responses. Media contribute differentially to the route to persuasion and may complement each other in a marketing-communication campaign. The results show that TV-only campaigns are superior in evoking cognitive responses. This superiority is probably due to the larger number of senses stimulated as well as the forced exposure associated with television as a delivery medium. Affective and conative responses do not significantly differ between the single-medium campaigns. Product involvement influences brand affect and purchase intention. The analysis of covariance reveals a complementarity effect in multiple-media campaigns compared to the Internet-only campaign. However, compared to the TV-only campaign, multiple-media campaigns are less effective in evoking cognitive responses. For most responses, print-only campaigns are as effective as multiple-media campaigns. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 386
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, J MARK COMMUN
[2]  
Broadbent DE, 1958, PERCEPTION COMMUNICA
[3]   THE ROLE OF CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT IN DETERMINING COGNITIVE RESPONSE TO BROADCAST ADVERTISING [J].
BUCHHOLZ, LM ;
SMITH, RE .
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 1991, 20 (01) :4-17
[4]  
Chaudhuri A., 1996, J MARK COMMUN, V2, P201
[5]   ATTENTION - SOME THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
DEUTSCH, JA ;
DEUTSCH, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1963, 70 (01) :80-90
[6]  
DREZE X, 1999, INTERNET ADVERTISING
[7]   THE INFORMATION-PROCESSING OF COORDINATED MEDIA CAMPAIGNS [J].
EDELL, JA ;
KELLER, KL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1989, 26 (02) :149-163
[8]  
EDELL JA, 1998, ANAL MEDIA INTERACTI
[9]  
Edell Julie A., 1988, Nonverbal Communication in Advertising, P11
[10]  
JACOBY J, 1983, READ VIEW LISTEN CRO, P201