The spatial correlation and interaction between environmental regulation and foreign direct investment

被引:62
作者
Cheng, Zhonghua [1 ]
Li, Lianshui [1 ]
Liu, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, China Inst Mfg Dev, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Foreign direct investment; Interaction; Pollution haven; Regulation competition; Spatial spillover effect; POLLUTION HAVEN; FDI; COMPETITION; LOCATION; CHINA; RACE;
D O I
10.1007/s11149-018-9366-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper uses spatial simultaneous equation models to analyze the two-way mechanism between environmental regulation and foreign direct investment (FDI). The results, based on data from 285 cities in China from 2003 to 2014, show the following. (1) Not only does environmental regulation have a significant impact on the location choice of FDI, but FDI tends to flow to a city with more relaxed environmental regulation. Environmental regulation can also trigger the near transfer effect of FDI. (2) FDI has a significant spatial spillover effect and this spatial spillover effect has an important impact on FDI and environmental regulation in a particular city. (3) Although multinationals choose a city with more relaxed environmental regulations when they invest in China, FDI inflows have increased both the number and severity of local environmental regulations, indicating that the pollution haven hypothesis does not hold in China. (4) Environmental regulation has a significant spatial spillover effect, and this spatial spillover effect has an important impact on both environmental regulation and FDI in cities. In China, there is also a local competitive effect of environmental regulation, albeit with significant regional differences.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 146
页数:23
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   How MNEs respond to environmental regulation: integrating the Porter hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis [J].
D'Agostino, Lorena M. .
ECONOMIA POLITICA, 2015, 32 (02) :245-269
[12]   Environmental regulation and MNEs location: Does CSR matter? [J].
Dam, Lammertjan ;
Scholtens, Bert .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 67 (01) :55-65
[13]   Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China [J].
Dean, Judith M. ;
Lovely, Mary E. ;
Wang, Hua .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2009, 90 (01) :1-13
[14]   Environmental Regulation: An Incentive for Foreign Direct Investment [J].
Dijkstra, Bouwe R. ;
Mathew, Anuj Joshua ;
Mukherjee, Arijit .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 19 (03) :568-578
[15]   FDI and environmental regulation: pollution haven or a race to the top? [J].
Dong, Baomin ;
Gong, Jiong ;
Zhao, Xin .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2012, 41 (02) :216-237
[16]   Are ASEAN countries havens for Japanese pollution-intensive industry? [J].
Elliott, Robert J. R. ;
Shimamoto, Kenichi .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2008, 31 (02) :236-254
[17]   Environmental Regulation Induced Foreign Direct Investment [J].
Elliott, Robert J. R. ;
Zhou, Ying .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2013, 55 (01) :141-158
[18]   FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS: A SURVEY [J].
Erdogan, Ayse M. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2014, 28 (05) :943-955
[19]   Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis [J].
Eskeland, GS ;
Harrison, AE .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2003, 70 (01) :1-23
[20]  
Ferrara I., 2015, SO EC J, V82, P257