It's Not About Being Right: Developing Argument Through Debate

被引:12
作者
Malloy, Jacquelynn A. [1 ]
Tracy, Kelly N. [2 ]
Scales, Roya Q. [2 ]
Menickelli, Kristin [2 ]
Scales, W. David [2 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, 101 Gantt Circle 401-A, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Western Carolina Univ, Cullowhee, NC 28723 USA
关键词
arguments; design-based research; critical participatory literacy; integrated instruction;
D O I
10.1177/1086296X19896495
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This research sought to develop argument as a problem-solving process by adding debate to social studies instruction with three groups of fifth-grade students. This design-based research (DBR) reports on the ways that instruction was refined across three topical units to develop argumentative agency and a critical participatory literacy. Students addressed current issues extended from historical events and engaged in issues collaboratively through debates, then individually in their writing. DBR approaches afforded a description of the factors that enhanced and inhibited argument development across the debate cycles and chronicled the modifications that were put in place to refine the instruction. A retrospective analysis led to pedagogical assertions that illuminate what was learned about the interrelationship of oral and written argument and the instructional refinements that were required to support arguments as a means of solving problems.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 100
页数:22
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Adichie ChimamandaNgozi., 2009, TEDGLOBAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL STUDIES
[3]  
[Anonymous], NAT CURR STAND SOC S
[4]  
*ARG CTR ED, SPAR DEB FORM RIG RE
[5]  
Bakhtin Michael, 1981, The Dialogic Imagination
[6]  
Bazerman C., 2015, Handbook of writing research, V2nd ed), P11
[7]  
BELLON J, 2006, NATL DEBATE PROJECTS
[8]  
*BIOGR, 2014, CHRIST COL BIOGR
[9]  
COHEN J, 1966, HDB CLIN PSYCHOL, P95
[10]  
Creswell J. W., 2012, ED RES PLANNING COND