Herbicide-Resistant Weeds in the United States and Their Impact on Extension

被引:10
作者
Scott, Barbara A. [1 ]
Vangessel, Mark J. [1 ]
White-Hansen, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Res & Educ Ctr, Georgetown, DE 19947 USA
关键词
Acetyl CoA carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors; acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors; triazines; EPSP synthase inhibitors; survey; extension; MANAGEMENT; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1614/WT-09-006.1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Herbicide-resistant weeds have impacted crop production throughout the United States, but the effect they have on extension programming has not been evaluated. In June 2007, 38 extension weed specialists throughout the United States, responded to a survey on herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds and the impact the), are having on extension education programming. Survey results revealed that HR weeds have had a significant impact on extension programming particularly for agronomic crops. In the last 10 yr, agronomic weed specialists' extension programming was almost twice as likely to be impacted by the presence of HR weeds as compared to horticultural programming. In the next 5 yr, agronomic extension programming is twice as likely to be altered. Of 37 weed species reported, seven genera or species of weeds represented 80% of the major HR biotypes reported. These include Amaranthus species, horseweed, Setaria species, common lambsquarters, kochia, giant rag-weed, and Lolium species. Five weed species (common ragweed, common lambsquarters, horseweed, kochia, and three foxtail species) exhibited weed by mode of action (MOA) interactions when evaluated as major or minor problems. Herbicide resistance problem severity differed For weed species, herbicide MOA, and crops. The results of this survey of university extension personnel confirm that HR weeds have impacted extension programming and will continue to impact programming in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 603
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Glyphosate-induced weed shifts
    Culpepper, A. Stanley
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (02) : 277 - 281
  • [2] Heap I., 2008, INT SURVEY HERBICIDE
  • [3] Glyphosate-resistant weeds and resistance management strategies: An Indiana, grower perspective
    Johnson, William G.
    Gibson, Kevin D.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (03) : 768 - 772
  • [4] Consultant perspectives on weed management needs in Arkansas cotton
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Smith, Kenneth L.
    Scott, Robert C.
    Gbur, Edward E.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (03) : 825 - 831
  • [5] Herbicide resistance: Where are we? How did we get here? Where are we going?
    Shaner, DL
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 9 (04) : 850 - 856
  • [6] Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995
    Webster, TM
    Coble, HD
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 11 (02) : 308 - 317
  • [7] Perceptions and beliefs about weed management: Perspectives of Ohio grain and produce farmers
    Wilson, Robyn S.
    Tucker, Mark A.
    Hooker, Neal H.
    LeJeune, Jeff T.
    Doohan, Doug
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 22 (02) : 339 - 350