An assessment method of operator's situation awareness reliability based on fuzzy logic-AHP

被引:20
作者
Li, Pengcheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Li [1 ]
Dai, Licao [1 ]
Zou, Yanhua [4 ]
Li, Xiaofang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South China, Human Factor Inst, Hengyang 421001, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ N Carolina, Syst Engn & Engn Management, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[3] Univ South China, Sch Nucl Sci & Technol, Hengyang 421001, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Inst Technol, Inst Human Factor & Safety Management, Hengyang 421002, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Situation awareness reliability; Fuzzy logic; Analytic hierarchy process; Digital nuclear power plants; DEPENDENCE ASSESSMENT; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SA RELIABILITY; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; AUTOMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.007
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In digital control rooms, situation awareness (SA) reliability has become an important element affecting operator's reliability. In order to establish a more reasonable assessment method of SA reliability under the condition of very lack of data, based on the established influential factor model of SA reliability considering the causality relationship of performance shaping factors (PSFs) in this paper, a fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-based method is established to more objectively assess SA reliability. The weight of PSFs is identified using AHP, and a fuzzy logic method is used to simulate the fuzzy assessment and reasoning process of operator's SA reliability, and a standardized method is built to determine the fuzzy rule base of fuzzy reasoning system for SA reliability assessment for reducing the subjectivity and uncertainty of expert judgment. Finally, an example is provided to illustrate the specific application of the proposed method. The results show that the established method takes account of the weight of PSFs and their causal influencing relationship, and the fuzzy logic method used to assess SA reliability can overcome the subjectivity and uncertainty of expert judgment, which makes the assessment results more objective and realistic. Furthermore, the method can be used to get more SA error data and have a wide range of application value.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 343
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]   An analytic model for situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators based on Bayesian inference [J].
Kim, MC ;
Seong, PH .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2006, 91 (03) :270-282
[22]  
Klir J., 1995, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications
[23]   A RULE-BASED MODEL OF HUMAN PROBLEM-SOLVING BEHAVIOR IN DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS [J].
KNAEUPER, A ;
ROUSE, WB .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1985, 15 (06) :708-719
[24]   A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis [J].
Konstandinidou, M ;
Nivolianitou, Z ;
Kiranoudis, C ;
Markatos, N .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2006, 91 (06) :706-716
[25]   Measuring situation awareness of operation teams in NPPs using a verbal protocol analysis [J].
Lee, Seung Woo ;
Park, Jinkyun ;
Kim, Ar Ryum ;
Seong, Poong Hyun .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2012, 43 :167-175
[26]   Study on operator's SA reliability in digital NPPs. Part 3: A quantitative assessment method [J].
Li, Peng-cheng ;
Zhang, Li ;
Dai, Li-cao ;
Li, Xiao-Fang .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2017, 109 :82-91
[27]   Study on operator's SA reliability in digital NPPs. Part 2: Data-driven causality model of SA [J].
Li, Peng-cheng ;
Zhang, Li. ;
Dai, Li-cao ;
Li, Xiao-fang .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2017, 109 :185-191
[28]   Study on operator's SA reliability in digital NPPs. Part 1: The analysis method of operator's errors of situation awareness [J].
Li Peng-cheng ;
Zhang Li ;
Dai Li-cao ;
Li Xiao-fang .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2017, 102 :168-178
[29]   Fuzzy logic-based approach for identifying the risk importance of human error [J].
Li Peng-cheng ;
Chen Guo-hua ;
Dai Li-cao ;
Zhang Li .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2010, 48 (07) :902-913
[30]   Fuzzy logic for process safety analysis [J].
Markowski, Adam S. ;
Mannan, M. Sam ;
Bigoszewska, Agata .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2009, 22 (06) :695-702