Breast Cancer Risk Estimation With Artificial Neural Networks Revisited Discrimination and Calibration

被引:65
作者
Ayer, Turgay [2 ]
Alagoz, Oguzhan [2 ]
Chhatwal, Jagpreet [3 ]
Shavlik, Jude W. [4 ]
Kahn, Charles E., Jr. [5 ]
Burnside, Elizabeth S. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[3] Merck Res Labs, Hlth Econ Stat, N Wales, PA USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Comp Sci, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[5] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53792 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
breast cancer; neural networks; risk assessment; discrimination; calibration; computer-assisted diagnosis; computer-assisted radiographic image interpretation; computer-assisted decisions; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; NATIONAL MAMMOGRAPHY DATABASE; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; INTERNIST-I; DIAGNOSIS; PREDICTION; QUALITY; BIOPSY; MODELS; REPRESENTATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.25081
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Discriminating malignant breast lesions from benign ones and accurately predicting the risk of breast cancer for individual patients are crucial to successful clinical decisions. In the past, several artificial neural network (ANN) models have been developed for breast cancer-risk prediction. All studies have reported discrimination performance, but not one has assessed calibration, which is an equivalently important measure for accurate risk prediction. In this study, the authors have evaluated whether an artificial neural network (ANN) trained on a large prospectively collected dataset of consecutive mammography findings can discriminate between benign and malignant disease and accurately predict the probability of breast cancer for individual patients. METHODS: Our dataset consisted of 62,219 consecutively collected mammography findings matched with the Wisconsin State Cancer Reporting System. The authors built a 3-layer feedforward ANN with 1000 hidden-layer nodes. The authors trained and tested their ANN by using 10-fold cross-validation to predict the risk of breast cancer. The authors used area the under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity to evaluate discriminative performance of the radiologists and their ANN. The authors assessed the accuracy of risk prediction (ie, calibration) of their ANN by using the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) goodness-of-fit test. RESULTS: Their ANN demonstrated superior discrimination (AUC, 0.965) compared with the radiologists (AUC, 0.939; P < .001). The authors' ANN was also well calibrated as shown by an H-L goodness of fit P-value of .13. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' ANN can effectively discriminate malignant abnormalities from benign ones and accurately predict the risk of breast cancer for individual abnormalities. Cancer 2010;116:3310-21. (C) 2010 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:3310 / 3321
页数:12
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions [J].
Agresti, A ;
Coull, BA .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1998, 52 (02) :119-126
[2]  
*AM COLL RAD, 2004, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, P AAAI IAAI
[4]   BREAST-CANCER - PREDICTION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK-BASED ON BI-RADS STANDARDIZED LEXICON [J].
BAKER, JA ;
KORNGUTH, PJ ;
LO, JY ;
WILLIFORD, ME ;
FLOYD, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (03) :817-822
[5]   Artificial neural network: Improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations [J].
Baker, JA ;
Kornguth, PJ ;
Lo, JY ;
Floyd, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 198 (01) :131-135
[6]   Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography [J].
Barlow, William E. ;
White, Emily ;
Ballard-Barbash, Rachel ;
Vacek, Pamela M. ;
Titus-Ernstoff, Linda ;
Carney, Patricia A. ;
Tice, Jeffrey A. ;
Buist, Diana S. M. ;
Geller, Berta M. ;
Rosenberg, Robert ;
Yankaskas, Bonnie C. ;
Kerlikowske, Karla .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1204-1214
[7]  
BASSETT LW, 1994, 13 US DEP HLTH HUM S
[8]   Determining the quality of breast cancer care: Do tumor registries measure up? [J].
Bickell, NA ;
Chassin, MR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 132 (09) :705-+
[9]   Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting [J].
Birdwell, RL ;
Bandodkar, P ;
Ikeda, DM .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (02) :451-457
[10]  
Bishop CM., 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT