Effects of agonist-antagonist opioids in humans trained in a hydromorphone/not hydromorphone discrimination

被引:0
作者
Preston, KL [1 ]
Bigelow, GE [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Behav Pharmacol Res Unit, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the discrimination of agonist-antagonist opioids in humans trained in a two-choice hydromorphone/not hydromorphone discrimination. Eight adult male volunteers with histories of opioid abuse who were not currently physically dependent were trained to discriminate the mu receptor agonist hydromorphone (3 mg/70 kg, i.m.) ("Drug A") from a "Not Drug A" training condition (saline placebo). Volunteers received financial reinforcement for correct responses. After training, generalization dose-effect curves for hydromorphone, butorphanol, pentazocine, nalbuphine, and buprenorphine were determined. Other subjective, behavioral, and physiological measures were concurrently collected in all sessions. In generalization testing hydromorphone and buprenorphine produced dose-related increases in hydromorphone-appropriate responses. Pentazocine produced an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve with complete substitution at 32 mg/70 kg but not at 64 mg/70 kg. Butorphanol and nalbuphine did not completely substitute for hydromorphone at any dose tested. These results differ from an earlier two-choice, Drug A versus Drug B (hydromorphone/saline) discrimination study. After Drug/Not Drug instructions the behavioral discriminations of agonist-antagonist opioids were more consistent with their putative agonist activities at the mu opioid receptor and with their subjective effects profiles than was the case after Drug A versus Drug B instructions. These results suggest that instructions are an important factor in the outcome of human drug discrimination studies.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 124
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ATOR NA, 1999, PHARM BIOCH BEHAV, V64, P137
[2]   Discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of opioids with mu and kappa activity: Data from laboratory animals and human subjects [J].
Dykstra, LA ;
Preston, KL ;
Bigelow, GE .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 130 (01) :14-27
[3]  
Emmerson PJ, 1996, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V278, P1121
[4]  
Finney D. J., 1964, STAT METHOD BIOL ASS, V2nd
[5]   DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS EFFECTS OF D-AMPHETAMINE, METHYLPHENIDATE, AND DIAZEPAM IN HUMANS [J].
HEISHMAN, SJ ;
HENNINGFIELD, JE .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 103 (04) :436-442
[6]   DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS EFFECTS OF NARCOTICS - EVIDENCE FOR MULTIPLE RECEPTOR-MEDIATED ACTIONS [J].
HERLING, S ;
WOODS, JH .
LIFE SCIENCES, 1981, 28 (14) :1571-1584
[7]  
Jarbe T, 1989, NEUROMETHODS, V13, P513
[8]  
JOHANSON CE, 1991, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V257, P634
[9]  
JOHANSON CE, 1991, BEHAV PHARMACOL, V2, P357
[10]  
Jones HE, 1999, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V289, P1350