Comparing the convergence and divergence within industrial ecology, circular economy, and the energy-water-food nexus based on resource management objectives

被引:37
作者
Al-Thani, Nayla Ahmad [1 ]
Al-Ansari, Tareq [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, Qatar Fdn, Div Sustainable Dev, Coll Sci & Engn, Doha, Qatar
[2] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, Qatar Fdn, Coll Sci & Engn, Div Engn Management & Decis Sci, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Sustainability indicators; Eco-industrial parks; Resource use efficiency; Urban metabolism; Industrial symbiosis; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY EVALUATION; COLLABORATION PLATFORM; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; SYMBIOSIS APPLICATION; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; ECO-EFFICIENCY; SOLID-WASTE; URBAN; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increasing need to conserve resources has led to the development of several concepts, tools, and frameworks to support optimum resource management (RM) in the past few decades. However, system designers and policy makers often find it difficult to navigate the wide array of available concepts. Energy-water-food nexus (EWF nexus), circular economy (CE), and industrial ecology (IE) are discussed in terms of their conceptual development, representative tools used to conduct analysis therein, and the performance indicators deployed to measure progress and performance. Unlike previous literature that focused on one or two of the aforementioned concepts in parallel, this review assesses the three concepts together based on the RM objectives. This review considers three popular concepts that support sustainable RM in terms of potential areas for convergence and divergence. The review is conducted in four stages: (i) identifying the research objective and relevant keywords after extracting articles from well-known databases; (ii) screening articles obtained from stage (i) by removing duplicates and applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria; (iii) reviewing the screened articles for eligibility; and (iv) defining the final list of articles to be included in the review and analysing them. The outcomes of this review suggest that the CE and EWF nexus are more flexible in terms of application scale (i.e. micro, meso, and macro), whereas IE is applied within industrial parks. Most EWF nexus studies focus on managing interlinkages and synergies between the three resources; however, CE and IE are more likely to focus on closing material/energy loops within defined system boundaries. This review sets the premise for future work, which can help align the three guiding concepts into a combined holistic effort to manage resources depending on the problem considered, either through a single framework or a coordinated effort wherein all three concepts are deployed. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1743 / 1761
页数:19
相关论文
共 163 条
  • [31] Eco-innovation in the transition to a circular economy: An analytical literature review
    de Jesus, Ana
    Antunes, Paula
    Santos, Rui
    Mendonca, Sandro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 2999 - 3018
  • [32] An index-based approach for the sustainability assessment of irrigation practice based on the water-energy-food nexus framework
    de Vito, Rossella
    Portoghese, Ivan
    Pagano, Alessandro
    Fratino, Umberto
    Vurro, Michele
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2017, 110 : 423 - 436
  • [33] Circular economy approach to reduce water-energy-food nexus
    Del Borghi, Adriana
    Moreschi, Luca
    Gallo, Michela
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & HEALTH, 2020, 13 : 23 - 28
  • [34] Is open-loop recycling the lowest preference in a circular economy? Answering through LCA of glass powder in concrete
    Deschamps, Joris
    Simon, Balint
    Tagnit-Hamou, Arezki
    Amor, Ben
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 185 : 14 - 22
  • [35] A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resource based, systemic approach
    Desing, Harald
    Brunner, Dunia
    Takacs, Fabian
    Nahrath, Stephane
    Frankenberger, Karolin
    Hischier, Roland
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 155 (155)
  • [36] Resource recovery and remediation of highly alkaline residues: A political industrial ecology approach to building a circular economy
    Deutz, Pauline
    Baxter, Helen
    Gibbs, David
    Mayes, William M.
    Gomes, Helena I.
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2017, 85 : 336 - 344
  • [37] Integrating industrial ecology principles into a set of environmental sustainability indicators for technology assessment
    Dewulf, J
    Van Langenhove, H
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2005, 43 (04) : 419 - 432
  • [38] Measuring resource efficiency and circular economy: A market value approach
    Di Maio, Francesco
    Rem, Peter Carlo
    Balde, Kees
    Polder, Michael
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 122 : 163 - 171
  • [39] LCA of greywater management within a water circular economy restorative thinking framework
    Dominguez, Sara
    Laso, Jara
    Margallo, Maria
    Aldaco, Ruben
    Rivero, Maria J.
    Irabien, Angel
    Ortiz, Inmaculada
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 621 : 1047 - 1056
  • [40] A methodological approach for assessing businness investments in renewable resources from a circular economy perspective
    Donia, Enrica
    Mineo, Angelo Marcello
    Sgroi, Filippo
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 76 : 823 - 827