Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy

被引:247
作者
Wirtz, Jochen [1 ]
So, Kevin Kam Fung [2 ]
Mody, Makarand Amrish [3 ]
Liu, Stephanie Q. [4 ]
Chun, HaeEun Helen [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Mkt, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ South Carolina, Sch Hotel Restaurant & Tourism Management, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Hospitality Adm, Dept Hospitality Management, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Consumer Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Serv Mkt, Ithaca, NY USA
关键词
Business model; Network effects; Sharing economy; Platforms; Ecosystem; Peer-to-peer; BUSINESS MODEL; CONSUMPTION; INNOVATION; AIRBNB; TRUST; FRAMEWORK; MOTIVATIONS; GOVERNANCE; REPUTATION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1108/JOSM-11-2018-0369
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine peer-to-peer sharing platform business models, their sources of competitive advantage, and the roles, motivations and behaviors of key actors in their ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a conceptual approach that is rooted in the service, tourism and hospitality, and strategy literature. Findings First, this paper defines key types of platform business models in the sharing economy anddescribes their characteristics. In particular, the authors propose the differentiation between sharing platforms of capacity-constrained vs capacity-unconstrained assets and advance five core properties of the former. Second, the authors contrast platform business models with their pipeline business model counterparts to understand the fundamental differences between them. One important conclusion is that platforms cater to vastly more heterogeneous assets and consumer needs and, therefore, require liquidity and analytics for high-quality matching. Third, the authors examine the competitive position of platforms and conclude that their widely taken "winner takes it all" assumption is not valid. Primary network effects are less important once a critical level of liquidity has been reached and may even turn negative if increased listings raise friction in the form of search costs. Once a critical level of liquidity has been reached, a platform's competitive position depends on stakeholder trust and service provider and user loyalty. Fourth, the authors integrate and synthesize the literature on key platform stakeholders of platform businesses (i.e. users, service providers, and regulators) and their roles and motivations. Finally, directions for further research are advanced. Practical implications - This paper helps platform owners, service providers and users understand better the implications of sharing platform business models and how to position themselves in such ecosystems. Originality/value This paper integrates the extant literature on sharing platforms, takes a novel approach in delineating their key properties and dimensions, and provides insights into the evolving and dynamic forms of sharing platforms including converging business models.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 483
页数:32
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   Personal or Product Reputation? Optimizing Revenues in the Sharing Economy [J].
Abrate, Graziano ;
Viglia, Giampaolo .
JOURNAL OF TRAVEL RESEARCH, 2019, 58 (01) :136-148
[2]   Unraveling the Personalization Paradox: The Effect of Information Collection and Trust-Building Strategies on Online Advertisement Effectiveness [J].
Aguirre, Elizabeth ;
Mahr, Dominik ;
Grewal, Dhruv ;
de Ruyter, Ko ;
Wetzels, Martin .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2015, 91 (01) :34-49
[3]   The sharing economy and the future of the hotel industry: Transaction cost theory and platform economics [J].
Akbar, Yusaf H. ;
Tracogna, Andrea .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 71 :91-101
[4]  
An C, 2018, THESIS
[5]   Business model innovation and value-creation: the triadic way [J].
Andreassen, Tor Wallin ;
Lervik-Olsen, Line ;
Snyder, Hannah ;
Van Riel, Allard C. R. ;
Sweeney, Jillian C. ;
Van Vaerenbergh, Yves .
JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 29 (05) :883-906
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, EUR MANAG J
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, J TRAVEL TOUR MARK, DOI DOI 10.1080/10548408.2016.1156613
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Arxiv.Org, DOI DOI 10.3389/FPSYG.2013.00124
[10]   Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces [J].
Bakos, JY .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1997, 43 (12) :1676-1692