Growth Response to Ionic and Osmotic Stress of NaCl in Salt-tolerant and Salt-sensitive Maize

被引:70
|
作者
Zhao, Ke-Fu [1 ]
Song, Jie [1 ]
Fan, Hai [1 ]
Zhou, San [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Meng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Normal Univ, Inst Plant Stress, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Univ, Coll Med Sci, Qingdao 266021, Peoples R China
关键词
PLANT-GROWTH; SALINITY; BARLEY; HALOPHYTES; RESISTANCE; WHEAT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00947.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Salt-tolerant maize (STM) and salt-sensitive maize (SSM) were treated with 100 mM NaCl for 1, 3 and 6 d and the contents of Na+ and Cl- (cps) of different organelles of leaf cells determined by X-ray microanalysis. The results showed that Na+ and Cl- entered the cytoplasm, vacuole, chloroplast and apoplast simultaneously. When STM and SSM were treated in 100 mM NaCl at atmospheric pressure (-P) and with pressure equivalent to the osmotic pressure of the NaCl (+P), the dry weights of STM (+P) and SSM (+P) plants were greater than that of STM (-P) and SSM (-P) plants, showing that the inhibitory effect of salt on plant growth was at least partially due to the osmotic effect of the NaCl. When STM and SSM were treated with NaCl and iso-osmotic polyethlene glycol, the dry weights of plants given the iso-osmotic polyethlene glycol treatment were lower for both maize lines than that of the NaCl-treated plants. Our data show that under NaCl stress, both STM and SSM seedlings simultaneously suffered from osmotic and ion stresses.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 475
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GENOTYPIC RESPONSES TO SALINITY - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SALT-SENSITIVE AND SALT-TOLERANT GENOTYPES OF TOMATO
    RUSH, DW
    EPSTEIN, E
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1976, 57 (02) : 162 - 166
  • [42] Glycinebetaine accumulation, physiological characterizations and growth efficiency in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive lines of indica rice (Oryza sativa L. Ssp indica) in response to salt stress
    Cha-um, S.
    Supaibulwatana, K.
    Kirdmanee, C.
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2007, 193 (03) : 157 - 166
  • [43] ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SALT-SENSITIVE MUTANTS OF A SALT-TOLERANT YEAST ZYGOSACCHAROMYCES-ROUXII
    YAGI, T
    TADA, K
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 1988, 49 (02) : 317 - 321
  • [44] Different Root Anatomical Changes in Salt-tolerant and Salt-sensitive Foxtail Millet Genotypes
    Karjunita, Nike
    Khumaida, Nurul
    Ardie, Sintho Wahyuning
    AGRIVITA, 2019, 41 (01): : 88 - 96
  • [45] Differences in responses of moderately salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive tree species to heterogeneous salinity
    Feng, X. H.
    An, P.
    Guo, K.
    Li, X. G.
    Liu, X. J.
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2018, 62 (03) : 589 - 594
  • [46] Differential behavior of the antioxidant system in response to salinity induced oxidative stress in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars of Brassica juncea L
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Jain, Veena
    Jain, Sunita
    BIOCATALYSIS AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 13 : 12 - 19
  • [47] NaCl-stress induced alteration in glutamine synthetase activity in excised senescing leaves of a salt-sensitive and a salt-tolerant rice cultivar in light and darkness
    Arun Chandra Sahu
    Sukanta Kumar Sahoo
    Nibedita Sahoo
    Plant Growth Regulation, 2001, 34 : 287 - 292
  • [48] Alleviation of detrimental effects of NaCl by silicon nutrition in salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)
    Ashraf, M.
    Rahmatullah
    Afzal, M.
    Ahmed, R.
    Mujeeb, F.
    Sarwar, A.
    Ali, L.
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2010, 326 (1-2) : 381 - 391
  • [49] Salt-tolerant and -sensitive seedlings exhibit noteworthy differences in lipolytic events in response to salt stress
    Gogna, Mansi
    Bhatla, Satish C.
    PLANT SIGNALING & BEHAVIOR, 2020, 15 (04)
  • [50] Alleviation of detrimental effects of NaCl by silicon nutrition in salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)
    M. Ashraf
    M. Rahmatullah
    R. Afzal
    F. Ahmed
    A. Mujeeb
    L. Sarwar
    Plant and Soil, 2010, 326 : 381 - 391