Estimating a state-space model from point process observations

被引:265
作者
Smith, AC [1 ]
Brown, EN
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Neurosci Stat Res Lab, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, MIT, Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/089976603765202622
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A widely used signal processing paradigm is the state-space model. The state-space model is defined by two equations: an observation equation that describes how the hidden state or latent process is observed and a state equation that defines the evolution of the process through time. Inspired by neurophysiology experiments in which neural spiking activity is induced by an implicit (latent) stimulus, we develop an algorithm to estimate a state-space model observed through point process measurements. We represent the latent process modulating the neural spiking activity as a gaussian autoregressive model driven by an external stimulus. Given the latent process, neural spiking activity is characterized as a general point process defined by its conditional intensity function. We develop an approximate expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm to estimate the unobservable state-space process, its parameters, and the parameters of the point process. The EM algorithm combines a point process recursive nonlinear filter algorithm, the fixed interval smoothing algorithm, and the state-space covariance algorithm to compute the complete data log likelihood efficiently. We use a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test based on the time-rescaling theorem to evaluate agreement between the model and point process data. We illustrate the model with two simulated data examples: an ensemble of Poisson neurons driven by a common stimulus and a single neuron whose conditional intensity function is approximated as a local Bernoulli process.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 991
页数:27
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Construction and analysis of non-Poisson stimulus-response models of neural spiking activity [J].
Barbieri, R ;
Quirk, MC ;
Frank, LM ;
Wilson, MA ;
Brown, EN .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2001, 105 (01) :25-37
[2]   The structure and precision of retinal spike trains [J].
Berry, MJ ;
Warland, DK ;
Meister, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (10) :5411-5416
[3]   READING A NEURAL CODE [J].
BIALEK, W ;
RIEKE, F ;
VANSTEVENINCK, RRD ;
WARLAND, D .
SCIENCE, 1991, 252 (5014) :1854-1857
[4]   RECURSIVE NON-LINEAR ESTIMATION OF A DIFFUSION ACTING AS THE RATE OF AN OBSERVED POISSON-PROCESS [J].
BOEL, RK ;
BENES, VE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1980, 26 (05) :561-575
[5]   The time-rescaling theorem and its application to neural spike train data analysis [J].
Brown, EN ;
Barbieri, R ;
Ventura, V ;
Kass, RE ;
Frank, LM .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2002, 14 (02) :325-346
[6]  
Brown EN, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P7411
[7]  
BROWN EN, 1987, THESIS HARVARD U CAM
[8]   MONTE-CARLO EM ESTIMATION FOR TIME-SERIES MODELS INVOLVING COUNTS [J].
CHAN, KS ;
LEDOLTER, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 90 (429) :242-252
[9]  
Cox D. R., 1980, POINT PROCESSES
[10]  
DALEY DJ, 1988, INTRO THEORY POINT