Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies

被引:400
作者
Petersen, Kathrine Birch [1 ]
Hoffmann, Elise [2 ]
Larsen, Christian Rifbjerg [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Nielsen, Henriette Svarre [1 ]
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Fertil Clin 4071, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Roskilde, Denmark
[3] Herlev Hosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Ctr Minimal Invas & Robot Surg Res, Dept Gynecol, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[4] Herlev Hosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Ctr Minimal Invas & Robot Surg Res, Dept Gen Surg, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[5] Herlev Hosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Ctr Minimal Invas & Robot Surg Res, Dept Urol, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
关键词
Cesarean scar pregnancy; early pregnancy complications; ectopic pregnancy; hysteroscopy methotrexate; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; LOCAL METHOTREXATE; LAPAROSCOPIC MANAGEMENT; OPERATIVE HYSTEROSCOPY; SURGICAL EVACUATION; SUCTION CURETTAGE; CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; SECTION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.130
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To study treatment modalities for cesarean scar pregnancies (CSPs), focusing on efficacy and complications in relation to study quality. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): A total of 2,037 women with CSP. Intervention(s): Review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library to find studies including five or more women. Data were extracted on primary treatment modality/efficacy, complications, and future fertility. The level of evidence was categorized according to Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine guidelines. Quality was assessed using The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tools for Randomized Controlled Trials and the modified Delphi techniques for case series. Meta-analysis was impossible owing to multifarious treatments. Main Outcome Measure(s): Successful first-line treatment. Complications were hysterectomy, laparotomy, bleeding >1,000 mL, or blood transfusion. Result(s): Fifty-two studies were included: four randomized, controlled trials and 48 case series. Fifteen of the 52 analyzed studies were scored as high quality. Treatment modalities were condensed to 14 different approaches. Combining study quality, level of evidence, efficacy, and safety, five approaches for treating CSP are recommended, depending on availability, severity of patient symptoms, and surgical skills: [1] resection through a transvaginal approach, [2] laparoscopy, [3] uterine artery embolization in combination with dilatation and curettage and hysteroscopy, [4] uterine artery embolization in combination with dilatation and curettage, and [5] hysteroscopy. Conclusion(s): This review recommends treatment options for CSP in clinical practice, based on efficacy and safety. The literature supports an interventional rather than medical approach. Present recommendations are primarily based on case series. Multicenter, well-designed studies are needed to draw definite conclusions on how to treat CSP. (C) 2016 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:958 / 967
页数:10
相关论文
共 79 条
[41]  
Osborn DA, 2012, J ULTRAS MED, V31, P1449
[42]   Exploration of the Successful Treatment Algorithms Used in 23 Cases of Early Live Cesarean Scar Pregnancy [J].
Peng, Mei ;
Li, Li ;
Ding, Yiling ;
Yu, Ling ;
Deng, Yali ;
Zheng, Jingjie ;
Wang, Liqiong ;
Wu, Xianqing ;
Zhang, Hongwen .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2015, 79 (02) :139-144
[43]   Comparative efficacy and safety of local and systemic methotrexate injection in cesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Peng, Ping ;
Gui, Ting ;
Liu, Xinyan ;
Chen, Weilin ;
Liu, Zhenzhen .
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 2015, 11 :137-142
[44]   Curettage or operative hysteroscopy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Qian, Zhi-Da ;
Huang, Li-Li ;
Zhu, Xiao-Ming .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 292 (05) :1055-1061
[45]   Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies - Etiology, diagnosis, and management [J].
Rotas, Michael A. ;
Haberman, Shoshana ;
Levgur, Michael .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (06) :1373-1381
[46]   Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: Focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation [J].
Savović J. ;
Weeks L. ;
Sterne J.A.C. ;
Turner L. ;
Altman D.G. ;
Moher D. ;
Higgins J.P.T. .
Systematic Reviews, 3 (1)
[47]   Transvaginal sono-guided aspiration of gestational sac concurrent with a local methotrexate injection for the treatment of unruptured cesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Seow, Kok-Min ;
Wang, Peng-Hui ;
Huang, Lee-Wen ;
Hwang, Jiann-Loung .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2013, 288 (02) :361-366
[48]   Is methotrexate administration needed for the treatment of caesarean section scar pregnancy in addition to suction curettage? [J].
Sevket, Osman ;
Keskin, Seda ;
Ates, Seda ;
Molla, Taner ;
Dansuk, Ramazan ;
Yazicioglu, Hasan Fehmi ;
Yucel, Oguz .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2014, 19 (02) :128-133
[49]   Bilateral uterine artery chemoembolization with methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Shen, Licong ;
Tan, Aixiang ;
Zhu, Huili ;
Guo, Chun ;
Liu, Dong ;
Huang, Wei .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 207 (05) :386.e1-386.e6
[50]   Implications of the First Cesarean: Perinatal and Future Reproductive Health and Subsequent Cesareans, Placentation Issues, Uterine Rupture Risk, Morbidity, and Mortality [J].
Silver, Robert M. .
SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2012, 36 (05) :315-323