Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies

被引:400
作者
Petersen, Kathrine Birch [1 ]
Hoffmann, Elise [2 ]
Larsen, Christian Rifbjerg [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Nielsen, Henriette Svarre [1 ]
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Fertil Clin 4071, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Roskilde, Denmark
[3] Herlev Hosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Ctr Minimal Invas & Robot Surg Res, Dept Gynecol, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[4] Herlev Hosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Ctr Minimal Invas & Robot Surg Res, Dept Gen Surg, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[5] Herlev Hosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Ctr Minimal Invas & Robot Surg Res, Dept Urol, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
关键词
Cesarean scar pregnancy; early pregnancy complications; ectopic pregnancy; hysteroscopy methotrexate; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; LOCAL METHOTREXATE; LAPAROSCOPIC MANAGEMENT; OPERATIVE HYSTEROSCOPY; SURGICAL EVACUATION; SUCTION CURETTAGE; CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; SECTION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.130
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To study treatment modalities for cesarean scar pregnancies (CSPs), focusing on efficacy and complications in relation to study quality. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): A total of 2,037 women with CSP. Intervention(s): Review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library to find studies including five or more women. Data were extracted on primary treatment modality/efficacy, complications, and future fertility. The level of evidence was categorized according to Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine guidelines. Quality was assessed using The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tools for Randomized Controlled Trials and the modified Delphi techniques for case series. Meta-analysis was impossible owing to multifarious treatments. Main Outcome Measure(s): Successful first-line treatment. Complications were hysterectomy, laparotomy, bleeding >1,000 mL, or blood transfusion. Result(s): Fifty-two studies were included: four randomized, controlled trials and 48 case series. Fifteen of the 52 analyzed studies were scored as high quality. Treatment modalities were condensed to 14 different approaches. Combining study quality, level of evidence, efficacy, and safety, five approaches for treating CSP are recommended, depending on availability, severity of patient symptoms, and surgical skills: [1] resection through a transvaginal approach, [2] laparoscopy, [3] uterine artery embolization in combination with dilatation and curettage and hysteroscopy, [4] uterine artery embolization in combination with dilatation and curettage, and [5] hysteroscopy. Conclusion(s): This review recommends treatment options for CSP in clinical practice, based on efficacy and safety. The literature supports an interventional rather than medical approach. Present recommendations are primarily based on case series. Multicenter, well-designed studies are needed to draw definite conclusions on how to treat CSP. (C) 2016 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:958 / 967
页数:10
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LEV OF EV
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ULTRASOUND CLIN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, DEV QUALITY APPRAISA, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40729-022-00428-0
[6]  
[Anonymous], J MATERN FETAL NEONA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, J REPROD CONTRACEPT, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1001-7844(09)60020-1
[8]   Caesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Ash, A. ;
Smith, A. ;
Maxwell, D. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (03) :253-263
[9]   Uterine artery embolization in cesarean scar pregnancy: safe and effective intervention [J].
Cao Shasha ;
Zhu Lihong ;
Jin Long ;
Gao Jian ;
Chen Chen .
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 127 (12) :2322-2326
[10]   Successful treatment of endogenous cesarean scar pregnancies with transabdominal ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone [J].
Chen Weilin ;
Jin Li .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 183 :20-22