Frequency of Aspirating Gastric Tubes for Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition in the ICU: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:17
|
作者
Williams, Teresa A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Leslie, Gavin [4 ]
Mills, Lauren [3 ]
Leen, Tim [3 ]
Davies, Hugh [3 ]
Hendron, David [3 ]
Dobb, Geoffrey J. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Prehosp Resuscitat & Emergency Care Res Unit, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
[2] ICU Royal Perth Hosp, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
[3] Royal Perth Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Perth, WA 6001, Australia
[4] Curtin Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Curtin Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Sch Med & Pharmacol, Crawley, WA, Australia
关键词
enteral nutrition; enteral feeding tube; nasogastric tube; gastric residual volume; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; VENTILATOR-ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA; INTENSIVE-CARE PATIENTS; RESIDUAL VOLUME; PARACETAMOL ABSORPTION; POOR VALIDITY; RISK; MARKER; ADULTS; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/0148607113497223
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) tolerance is often monitored by aspirating stomach contents by syringe at prescribed intervals. No studies have been conducted to assess the most appropriate time interval for aspirating gastric tubes. We compared gastric tube aspirations every 4 hours (usual care) with a variable regimen (up to every 8 hours aspirations). Methods: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled patients who stayed in the intensive care unit (ICU) for >48 hours, had a gastric tube, and were likely to receive EN for 3 or more days. Patients were randomized (computer-generated randomization) to either the control (every 4 hours) or intervention group (variable regimen). The primary outcome was number of gastric tube aspirations per day from randomization until EN was ceased or up to 2 weeks postrandomization. Results: Following Institutional Ethics Committee approval, 357 patients were recruited (control group, n = 179; intervention group, n = 178). No differences were found in age, sex, worst APACHE II score, or time to start of EN. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the intervention group had fewer tube aspirations per day (3.4 versus 5.4 in the control group, P < .001). Vomiting/regurgitation was increased in the intervention group (2.1% versus 3.6%, P = .02). There were no other differences in complications. Conclusion: This is the first RCT to examine the frequency of gastric tube aspirations. The frequency of gastric tube aspirations was reduced in the variable-regimen group with no increase in risk to the patient. Reducing the frequency of aspirations saves nursing time, decreases risk of contamination of feeding circuit, and minimizes risk of body fluid exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 816
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition in ICU patients: the REGANE study
    Montejo, J. C.
    Minambres, E.
    Bordeje, L.
    Mesejo, A.
    Acosta, J.
    Heras, A.
    Ferre, M.
    Fernandez-Ortega, F.
    Vaquerizo, C. I.
    Manzanedo, R.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 36 (08) : 1386 - 1393
  • [2] Comparison of Different Gastric Residual Volumes in Intensive Care Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition Support
    Tekin, Esra
    Akan, Mert
    Koca, Ugur
    Adiyaman, Esma
    Gokmen, Ali Necati
    Ozkardesler, Sevda
    Buyukcoban, Sibel
    Kilicaslan, Necmiye
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE-TURK YOGUN BAKIM DERGISI, 2019, 17 (01): : 25 - 30
  • [3] An overview of diarrhea in ICU patients receiving enteral nutrition
    Chen, Weiting
    Chen, Junbo
    Lin, Bin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (09): : 11893 - 11897
  • [4] Gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition in ICU patients: the REGANE study
    J. C. Montejo
    E. Miñambres
    L. Bordejé
    A. Mesejo
    J. Acosta
    A. Heras
    M. Ferré
    F. Fernandez-Ortega
    C. I. Vaquerizo
    R. Manzanedo
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2010, 36 : 1386 - 1393
  • [5] Proportions of prognostic scoring models among ICU patients receiving enteral nutrition
    Jazayeri, Seyed Mohammad Hosein Mousavi
    Ostadrabi, Alireza
    Hashemzadeh, Shabryar
    Safaiyan, Abdolrasoul
    Salebpour, Firouz
    Barati, Meisam
    Azizi-Soleiman, Fatemeb
    PROGRESS IN NUTRITION, 2018, 20 (04): : 635 - 641
  • [6] Effects of fiber and probiotics on diarrhea associated with enteral nutrition in gastric cancer patients: A prospective randomized and controlled trial
    Zhao, Rui
    Wang, Yong
    Huang, Yuqian
    Cui, Yaping
    Xia, Lin
    Rao, Zhiyong
    Zhou, Yong
    Wu, Xiaoting
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (43)
  • [7] Causes and impacts of interrupted enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: A secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Zheng, Hengyu
    Cai, Lina
    Wang, Pingrong
    Zheng, Lijiang
    Lin, Jiajia
    Sun, Ting
    Li, Jiaqi
    Zuo, Juntao
    Liu, Yuxiu
    Ye, Xianghong
    Chinese Critical Care Nutr Trials Grp CCCNTG
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2025, 30 (02)
  • [8] Optimizing early enteral nutrition in severe stroke (OPENS): protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial
    Yuan, Fang
    Yang, Fang
    Zhang, Wei
    Jia, Yi
    Ma, Yaling
    Qu, Yongcai
    Wang, Xinglai
    Huo, Kang
    Wang, Chengkai
    Yuan, Xiangjun
    Song, Chaohui
    Zhang, Bei
    Jiang, Wen
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [9] Advances in management strategies for enteral nutrition-related gastric retention in adult patients with nasogastric tubes
    Feng, Li-Fei
    Li, Xiang-Wei
    Zhu, Xiao-Qiu
    Jin, Lin-Na
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2025, 17 (03):
  • [10] Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Gliwska, Elwira
    Guzek, Dominika
    Przekop, Zuzanna
    Sobocki, Jacek
    Glabska, Dominika
    NUTRIENTS, 2021, 13 (12)