Merging top-down and bottom-up approaches in marine protected areas planning: experiences from around the globe

被引:111
作者
Gaymer, Carlos F. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Stadel, Angela V. [5 ]
Ban, Natalie C. [6 ]
Francisco Carcamo, P. [7 ]
Ierna, Joseph, Jr. [8 ]
Lieberknecht, Louise M. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catolica Norte, Dept Biol Marina, Coquimbo, Chile
[2] CEAZA, Coquimbo, Chile
[3] Millennium Nucleus Ecol & Sustainable Management, Honolulu, HI USA
[4] IEB, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[5] Environm Canada, Canadian Wildlife Serv, Delta, BC, Canada
[6] Univ Victoria, Sch Environm Studies, Victoria, BC, Canada
[7] Inst Fomento Pesquero, Dept Medio Ambiente, Coquimbo, Chile
[8] Ocean CREST Alliance, Long Isl, Bahamas
[9] UCL, Dept Geog, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
bottom-up; capacity building; community-based management; marine protected areas; participation; top-down; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS; EASTER-ISLAND; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; IMPLEMENTATION; CHALLENGES; CHILE; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1002/aqc.2508
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
1. Five case studies from around the world illustrate key lessons in integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches to stakeholder and community engagement in the planning and implementation of marine protected areas (MPAs). 2. Community resistance to MPA proposals from centralized agencies can be addressed through effective participatory processes with consistent engagement over time, transparency, and the incorporation of benefits for communities. 3. Indigenous communities in particular are becoming key actors of some conservation initiatives (e.g. MPAs) and recognition of their inherent rights, traditional knowledge and deep connections to the marine environment can become the foundations for collaborative management of MPAs. 4. True participation requires empowerment for engagement, and this in turn requires education and capacity building for local people to get involved in the process of planning, implementing, and managing MPAs. 5. How bottom-up and top-down approaches are used should consider the scale of the MPA (e.g. small vs. large), the geographic scenario (e.g. coastal vs. remote), the level of anthropogenic influence, the conservation objectives (e.g. species, habitats, ecosystems), the political and governance context, and specific cultural conditions, such as the presence of indigenous communities. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 144
页数:17
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Mind the gap Addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning [J].
Agardy, Tundi ;
di Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo ;
Christie, Patrick .
MARINE POLICY, 2011, 35 (02) :226-232
[2]  
[Anonymous], GUID SEL DES MAR CON
[3]  
[Anonymous], MAR CONS ZON PROJ EC
[4]   The marine and coastal access act A-hornets' nest? [J].
Appleby, Tom ;
Jones, Peter J. S. .
MARINE POLICY, 2012, 36 (01) :73-77
[5]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[6]  
BANS NC, 2011, J EXPT MARINE BIOL E, V408, P21
[7]  
BANS NC, 2013, FRONTIERS ECOLOGY EN, V11, P194
[8]   Policy implications of protected area discourse in the Pacific islands [J].
Bartlett, C. Y. ;
Maltali, T. ;
Petro, G. ;
Valentine, P. .
MARINE POLICY, 2010, 34 (01) :99-104
[9]   Community conserved areas: policy issues in historic and contemporary context [J].
Berkes, Fikret .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2009, 2 (01) :19-24
[10]  
BERTZKYS B, 2012, PROTECTED PLANET REP