Understanding social demand for sustainable nature conservation. The case of a protected natural space in South-Eastern Spain

被引:15
作者
Alcon, Francisco [1 ]
Albaladejo-Garcia, Jose A. [2 ]
Zabala, Jose A. [1 ]
Marin-Minano, Cristina [1 ]
Martinez-Paz, Jose M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Univ Cartagena, ETSIA, Business Econ Dept, Paseo Alfonso 18,48, Cartagena 30203, Spain
[2] Univ Murcia, Fac Econ, Appl Econ Dept, Campus Espinardo, E-30100 Murcia, Spain
关键词
Biodiversity; Willingness to pay; Choice experiment; Environmental management; Non-market valuation; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUATION; ECONOMIC VALUATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; MAR MENOR; BIODIVERSITY; BENEFITS; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125722
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The implementation of sustainable management plans for protected areas is one of the main challenges for public institutions. These plans involve public participation and the assessment of social benefits provided by these open spaces. This work proposes the use of choice experiments methodology for the evaluation of management alternatives for a protected area. The case study within this work is El Valle and Carrascoy Natural Park, which is included in the Natura 2000 Network. This Protected Natural Area (PNA) is located in a peri-urban area; thus, it combines high natural values and high anthropic pressure. A Choice Experiment (CE) was designed through consultation with the Park managers and technicians, and it was applied to a representative sample of the population within the Region of Murcia (South-Eastern Spain). CE allowed an estimation of the value of different management alternatives, classified according to the three main sustainability areas: social; economic; and, environmental. The results show population's demand for environmental management alternatives, such as protection of flora and fauna and promotion of ecotourism, as well as a rejection of quarrying in the PNA. The economic values estimated allow the proposal of a distribution of the annual budget of the PNA according to the social demand.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Adams W.M., 2007, Conservation and Society, V5, P147, DOI [DOI 10.2307/26392879, 10.2307/26392879]
  • [2] Adoption of irrigation water policies to guarantee water supply: A choice experiment
    Alcon, Francisco
    Tapsuwan, Sorada
    Brouwer, Roy
    de Miguel, Maria D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 44 : 226 - 236
  • [3] Understanding PES from the ground up: a combined choice experiment and interview approach to understanding PES in Costa Rica
    Allen, Karen E.
    Colson, Gregory
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (02) : 391 - 404
  • [4] Model forests in Russia as landscape approach: Demonstration projects or initiatives for learning towards sustainable forest management?
    Angelstam, Per
    Elbakidze, Marine
    Axelsson, Robert
    Khoroshev, Alexander
    Pedroli, Bas
    Tysiachniouk, Maria
    Zabubenin, Evgeny
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 101 : 96 - 110
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, APPL CHOICE ANAL PRI
  • [6] Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions: The case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods
    Barkmann, J.
    Glenk, K.
    Keil, A.
    Leemhuis, C.
    Dietrich, N.
    Gerold, G.
    Marggraf, R.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (01) : 48 - 62
  • [7] Choosing not to choose: A meta-analysis of status quo effects in environmental valuations using choice experiments
    Barreiro-Hurle, Jesus
    Espinosa-Goded, Maria
    Miguel Martinez-Paz, Jose
    Perni, Angel
    [J]. ECONOMIA AGRARIA Y RECURSOS NATURALES, 2018, 18 (01): : 79 - 109
  • [8] The impact of protest responses in choice experiments: an application to a Biosphere Reserve Management Program
    Barrio, Melina
    Loureiro, Maria
    [J]. FOREST SYSTEMS, 2013, 22 (01) : 94 - 105
  • [9] A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies
    Barrio, Melina
    Loureiro, Maria L.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (05) : 1023 - 1030
  • [10] Bateman IJ., 2002, EC VALUATION STATED