What if Peer-Review Process Is Killing Thinking-Out-of-the-Box Science?

被引：1
|
作者：
Riera, R. [1 ,2 ]
Rodriguez, R. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Grp Biodivers & Conservac, IU ECOAQUA, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
[2] Univ Catolica Santisima Concepcion, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ecol, Concepcion, Chile
[3] Assoc Interdisciplinary Adv Basic & Appl Sci, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
来源：
FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE | 2022年 / 9卷
关键词：
science; evaluators; unconventional; bias; papers; TIME ALLOCATION; PROGRESS; ECOLOGY;
D O I：
10.3389/fmars.2022.924469
中图分类号：
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号：
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要：
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页数：4
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Assessing the quality of feedback in the peer-review process
    Dobele, A. R.
    HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 34 (05) : 853 - 868
  • [2] Is This Referee Really My Peer? A Challenge to the Peer-Review Process
    Tsang, Eric W. K.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY, 2013, 22 (02) : 166 - 171
  • [3] Peer-Review Mentorship What It Is and Why We Need It
    Haase, Kristen R.
    Dzurec, Laura
    ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 2019, 42 (03) : 191 - 192
  • [4] An Examination of Gender Differences in the American Fisheries Society Peer-Review Process
    Handley, Grace
    Frantz, Cynthia M.
    Kocovsky, Patrick M.
    DeVries, Dennis R.
    Cooke, Steven J.
    Claussen, Julie
    FISHERIES, 2015, 40 (09) : 442 - 451
  • [5] On the Need for Quantitative Bias Analysis in the Peer-Review Process
    Fox, Matthew P.
    Lash, Timothy L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 185 (10) : 865 - 868
  • [6] Reimagining the peer-review system for translational health science journals
    Smith, Elise M.
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 14 (04): : 1210 - 1221
  • [7] Unconceived alternatives and conservatism in science: the impact of professionalization, peer-review, and Big Science
    Stanford, P. Kyle
    SYNTHESE, 2019, 196 (10) : 3915 - 3932
  • [8] The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal
    Isenberg, S. J.
    Sanchez, E.
    Zafran, K. C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 93 (07) : 881 - 884
  • [9] The peer-review process: critical issues and challenges from an online survey
    Moirano, Giovenale
    Listorti, Elisabetta
    Asta, Federica
    Macciotta, Alessandra
    Murtas, Rossella
    Ottone, Marta
    Petri, Davide
    Renzi, Matteo
    EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE, 2024, 48 (02): : 149 - 157
  • [10] Objectivity of the peer-review process: Enduring myth, reality, and possible remedies
    Baveye, Philippe C.
    LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2021, 34 (04) : 696 - 700
123