Assessing Novelty and Systems Thinking in Conceptual Models of Technological Systems

被引:12
作者
Lavi, Rea [1 ]
Dori, Yehudit Judy [2 ,3 ]
Dori, Dov [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Sch Engn, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Educ Sci & Technol, IL-3200003 Haifa, Israel
[3] Samuel Neaman Inst Natl Policy, IL-3200003 Haifa, Israel
[4] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Ind Engn & Management, IL-3200003 Haifa, Israel
关键词
Assessment tools; creativity; graduate education; model-based system design; novelty; object-process methodology; student assessment; systems thinking; teams; CREATIVITY; DEFINITION; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1109/TE.2020.3022238
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contribution: The authors present a methodology for assessing both novelty and systems thinking, as expressed in the same conceptual models constructed by graduate engineering students. Background: Companies worldwide seek employees with creativity and systems thinking, since solving design problems requires both skills. Novelty and usefulness are the most commonly accepted components of creativity, while systems thinking is the holistic understanding of systems. Research Question: How can novelty and systems thinking be assessed based on conceptual models (of technological systems) constructed by graduate engineering students? Methodology: Six student teams of two to four members each (N = 21) constructed solution models based on Object-Process Methodology, a formal methodology and language for model-based systems engineering. The authors assessed these models for novelty and for systems thinking using two existing rubrics based on the construction of system aspects-function, structure, and behavior. Findings: The authors provide indications that both novelty and systems thinking can be assessed based on conceptual models of technological systems.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 162
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, WORLD MOTION SYSTEMS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, 5 DISCIPLINE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, FUTURE JOBS EMPLOYME
  • [4] A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach
    Arnold, Ross D.
    Wade, Jon P.
    [J]. 2015 CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2015, 44 : 669 - 678
  • [5] Azemi A., 2019, 2019 IEEE FRONTIERS
  • [6] Establishing the validity and reliability of a modified tool for assessing innovative thinking of engineering students
    Barak, Miri
    Watted, Abeer
    Haick, Hossam
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (02) : 212 - 223
  • [7] Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering
    Baxter, Gordon
    Sommerville, Ian
    [J]. INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2011, 23 (01) : 4 - 17
  • [8] Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
  • [9] Assessing Creativity Specific to Engineering with the Revised Creative Engineering Design Assessment
    Charyton, Christine
    Jagacinski, Richard J.
    Merrill, John A.
    Clifton, William
    DeDios, Samantha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2011, 100 (04) : 778 - 799
  • [10] Checkland P, 2000, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V17, pS11, DOI 10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::AID-SRES374>3.0.CO