A randomised controlled trial comparing birthing centre care with delivery suite care in Adelaide, Australia

被引:38
作者
Byrne, JP [1 ]
Crowther, CA [1 ]
Moss, JR [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Victoria Hosp, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1479-828X.2000.tb03333.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Birthing centre care offers women with a low risk of complication in pregnancy an alternative to conventional care for the birthing of their baby. It is important these two forms of care are appropriately assessed. A randomised controlled trial comparing the newly opened birthing centre with the established conventional delivery suite was conducted at the then Queen Victoria Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia. The outcomes measured included maternal satisfaction, costs and clinical outcomes both for mother and baby which related to the need for Caesarean section, episiotomy or tear rate and method of feeding. Two hundred and one women attending the hospital's antenatal clinic were randomly allocated to either birthing centre or delivery suite care. One hundred women were allocated to the birthing centre. No differences were found in either group related to clinical outcomes or costs. The only difference in maternal satisfaction was the choice women made for their next birth. More women in the birthing centre group felt they were encouraged to breastfeed immediately after birth. While the numbers in this study were too small. to detect any but large differences in outcome, birthing centre care should remain an option for women and further studies undertaken with larger numbers.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 274
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] THE SAFETY OF TEAM MIDWIFERY - THE 1ST DECADE OF THE MONASH-BIRTH-CENTER
    BIRO, M
    LUMLEY, J
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1991, 155 (07) : 478 - 480
  • [2] WOMENS 1ST EXPERIENCES OF CHILDBIRTH - 2 HOSPITAL SETTINGS COMPARED
    BRADLEY, BS
    TASHEVSKA, M
    SELBY, JM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 63 : 227 - 237
  • [3] SATISFACTION WITH CHILDBIRTH - THEORIES AND METHODS OF MEASUREMENT
    BRAMADAT, IJ
    DRIEDGER, M
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1993, 20 (01): : 22 - 29
  • [4] CALLAS P, 1983, MIDWIVES CHRONICLE, V96, P1148
  • [5] CHAMBLISS LR, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V80, P161
  • [6] THE USE OF A BIRTHROOM - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING DELIVERY WITH THAT IN THE LABOR WARD
    CHAPMAN, MG
    JONES, M
    SPRING, JE
    DESWIET, M
    CHAMBERLAIN, GVP
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1986, 93 (02): : 182 - 187
  • [7] OUTCOMES AND PROCEDURES IN LOW-RISK BIRTH - A COMPARISON OF HOSPITAL AND BIRTH CENTER SETTINGS
    FELDMAN, E
    HURST, M
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1987, 14 (01): : 18 - 24
  • [8] FLINT C, 1988, KNOW YOUR MIDWIFE RE
  • [9] IN-HOSPITAL CARE FOR LOW-RISK CHILDBIRTH - COMPARISON WITH RESULTS FROM THE NATIONAL BIRTH CENTER STUDY
    FULLERTON, JT
    SEVERINO, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY, 1992, 37 (05): : 331 - 340
  • [10] A randomized, controlled trial of nurse-midwifery care
    Harvey, S
    Jarrell, J
    Brant, R
    Stainton, C
    Rach, D
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1996, 23 (03): : 128 - 135