Contextualizing Cannabis Implicit Associations: Consideration of Peers and Personality

被引:0
作者
Ramer, Nolan E. [1 ]
Colder, Craig R. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Univ Buffalo, Dept Psychol, 359 Pk Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
cannabis; marijuana; peer norms; personality; reinforcement sensitivity; peer context; peer approval and use; implicit association task; IAT; MARIJUANA USE; REINFORCEMENT SENSITIVITY; EARLY ADOLESCENCE; SUBSTANCE USE; SOCIAL NORMS; ALCOHOL-USE; COLLEGE; EXPECTANCIES; REWARD; IMPULSIVITY;
D O I
10.1177/21676968211021672
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective: Implicit cannabis associations (ICAs) inconsistently predict cannabis use (CU), and little is known about their formation. Personality, behavioral approach and inhibition, were tested as predictors of ICAs, which in turn, was expected to predict CU (mediation). Peer context was tested as a moderator. Method: Data were taken from three annual assessments of a larger longitudinal study. The community sample (314 emerging adults, mean age = 19.13, 54% female, 76% White/non-Hispanic at the first assessment) completed an ICA task and questionnaire assessments of CU, personality, and peer norms. Results: ICAs were positively associated with CU at high but not low levels of perceived peer approval/use. Behavioral inhibition was negatively associated ICAs, which in turn, predicted infrequent CU at high levels of peer approval/use (moderated mediation). Behavioral approach was marginally associated with ICAs. Conclusions: Peer context and personality are important for understanding the formation of ICAs and their association with CU.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 594
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [32] Being stoned: a review of self-reported cannabis effects
    Green, B
    Kavanagh, D
    Young, R
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2003, 22 (04) : 453 - 460
  • [33] Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test
    Greenwald, AG
    McGhee, DE
    Schwartz, JLK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (06) : 1464 - 1480
  • [34] A Critique of the Cross-Lagged Panel Model
    Hamaker, Ellen L.
    Kuiper, Rebecca M.
    Grasman, Raoul P. P. P.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2015, 20 (01) : 102 - 116
  • [35] Expectancies and self-efficacy mediate the effects of impulsivity on marijuana use outcomes: An application of the acquired preparedness model
    Hayaki, Jumi
    Herman, Debra S.
    Hagerty, Claire E.
    de Dios, Marcel A.
    Anderson, Bradley J.
    Stein, Michael D.
    [J]. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2011, 36 (04) : 389 - 396
  • [36] Cannabis and anxiety and depression in young adults: A large prospective study
    Hayatbakhsh, Mohammad R.
    Najman, Jake M.
    Jamrozik, Konrad
    Mamun, Abdullah A.
    Alati, Rosa
    Bor, William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 46 (03) : 408 - 417
  • [37] Assessing implicit alcohol associations with the Implicit Association Test: Fact or artifact?
    Houben, Katrijn
    Wiers, Reinout W.
    [J]. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2006, 31 (08) : 1346 - 1362
  • [38] Hox J. J., 2010, MULTILEVEL ANAL TECH, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315650982
  • [39] Impulsivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfunction in drug abuse: implications for the control of behavior by reward-related stimuli
    Jentsch, JD
    Taylor, JR
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 146 (04) : 373 - 390
  • [40] Johnston L.D., 2018, Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2017, DOI [DOI 10.3998/2027.42/148123, 10.3998/2027.42/148123]