Impacts of elevated CO2, climate change and their interactions on water budgets in four different catchments in Australia

被引:28
|
作者
Cheng, Lei [1 ]
Zhang, Lu [1 ]
Wang, Ying-Ping [2 ]
Yu, Qiang [3 ]
Eamus, Derek [3 ,4 ]
O'Grady, Anthony [5 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Land & Water Flagship, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] CSIRO Ocean & Atmosphere Flagship, Aspendale, Vic 3195, Australia
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Sci, Plant Funct Biol & Climate Change Cluster, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[4] Univ Technol Sydney, Natl Ctr Groundwater Res & Training, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[5] CSIRO Land & Water Flagship, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration; Carbon-water coupling relationship; Changing climate; Water balance; Physiological effects; ATMOSPHERIC CO2; USE EFFICIENCY; RISING CO2; VEGETATION FEEDBACKS; ECOSYSTEM CARBON; ENRICHMENT FACE; GLOBAL CHANGE; RESPONSES; MODEL; RUNOFF;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.020
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Future water availability is affected directly by climate change mainly through changes in precipitation and indirectly by the biological effects of climate change and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration (eCO(2)) through changes in vegetation water use. Previous studies of climate change impact on hydrology have focused on the direct impact and little has been reported in the literature on catchment-scale the indirect impact. In this study, we calibrated an ecohydrological model (WAVES) and used this model to estimate the direct and indirect effects and the interactive effect between climate change and eCO(2) on water availability in four different catchments in Australia with contrasting climate regime and vegetation cover. These catchments were: a water-limited forest catchment and an energy-limited forest catchment, a water-limited grass catchment and an energy-limited grass catchment. The future meteorological forcing was projected from similar to 2 GCMs representing a period centred on 2050s and future CO2 concentration was set as 550 ppm. Modelling experiments show that impacts of eCO(2) and projected climate change on vegetation growth, evapotranspiration (ET) and runoff were in the same magnitude but opposite directions in all four catchments, except for the effects on runoff in the energy-limited grass catchment. Predicted responses of runoff to eCO(2) indicate that eCO(2) increased runoff in the energy-limited forest catchment by 2% but decreased runoff in other three catchments from 1% to 18%. This study indicates that rising CO2 increases ecosystem water use efficiency but it does not necessarily result in increased runoff because elevated CO2 also stimulates vegetation growth and increases ET. Elevated CO2 was proved to have greater impacts on runoff than climate change in the forest catchments. Modelling experiments also suggest that interactive effects between climate and CO2 are important, especially for predicting leaf area index (LAI) and ET in grassland catchments or runoff in water-limited catchments, where interactive effects were 1-6%. It implies that the assumption that linear combination of individual effects in most of previous studies is not appropriate. This study highlights the importance of considering elevated CO2 in assessing climate change impacts on catchment-scale water balance and failure to account for direct eCO(2) effect or its interactive effects can lead to large bias in the predictions of future water budgets, especially for the water-limited catchments in Australia. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1350 / 1361
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impacts of climate change and elevated CO2 on trees in regions with a Mediterranean type of climate
    Pereira, JS
    Chaves, MM
    IMPACTS OF GLOBAL CHANGE ON TREE PHYSIOLOGY AND FOREST ECOSYSTEMS, 1998, 52 : 213 - 223
  • [2] Climate Change Impacts on Cacao: Genotypic Variation in Responses of Mature Cacao to Elevated CO2 and Water Deficit
    Lahive, Fiona
    Handley, Liam R.
    Hadley, Paul
    Daymond, Andrew J.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [3] Uncertainty in hydrological modelling of climate change impacts in four Norwegian catchments
    Lawrence, Deborah
    Haddeland, Ingjerd
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2011, 42 (06): : 457 - 471
  • [4] The consequences of CO2 stabilisation for the impacts of climate change
    Arnell, NW
    Cannell, MGR
    Hulme, M
    Kovats, RS
    Mitchell, JFB
    Nicholls, RJ
    Parry, ML
    Livermore, MTJ
    White, A
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2002, 53 (04) : 413 - 446
  • [5] The Consequences of CO2 Stabilisation for the Impacts of Climate Change
    N. W. Arnell
    M. G. R. Cannell
    M. Hulme
    R. S. Kovats
    J. F. B. Mitchell
    R. J. Nicholls
    M. L. Parry
    M. T. J. Livermore
    A. White
    Climatic Change, 2002, 53 : 413 - 446
  • [6] Assessment of Socio-Economic and Climate Change Impacts on Water Resources in Four European Lagoon Catchments
    Anastassi Stefanova
    Cornelia Hesse
    Valentina Krysanova
    Martin Volk
    Environmental Management, 2019, 64 : 701 - 720
  • [7] Assessment of Socio-Economic and Climate Change Impacts on Water Resources in Four European Lagoon Catchments
    Stefanova, Anastassi
    Hesse, Cornelia
    Krysanova, Valentina
    Volk, Martin
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 64 (06) : 701 - 720
  • [8] Unravelling the impacts of elevated CO2 and elevated temperature on Spodoptera exigua in chickpea- Indian climate change context
    Rao, M. Srinivasa
    Rao, C. A. Rama
    Gayatri, D. L. A.
    Pratibha, G.
    Chandran, M. A. Sarath
    Rao, A. V. M. Subba
    Prabhakar, M.
    Singh, V. K.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2025, 19
  • [9] Modelling grassland responses to climate change and elevated CO2
    Riedo, M
    Gyalistras, D
    Grub, A
    Rosset, M
    Fuhrer, J
    ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1997, 18 (03): : 305 - 311
  • [10] Plant carbon metabolism and climate change: elevated CO2 and temperature impacts on photosynthesis, photorespiration and respiration
    Dusenge, Mirindi Eric
    Duarte, Andre Galvao
    Way, Danielle A.
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2019, 221 (01) : 32 - 49