Ferntosecond-assisted Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring implantation for treatment of keratoconus: Functional outcomes at one year

被引:4
|
作者
Gauthier, A. -S. [1 ]
Friot, M. [1 ]
Montard, R. [1 ]
Saleh, M. [1 ]
Delbosc, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Jean Minjoz, Serv Ophtalmol, 2 Blvd Fleming, F-25030 Besancon, France
来源
JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE | 2016年 / 39卷 / 05期
关键词
Intrastromal corneal rings; Keratoconus; Predictive factors of success; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; INTRACORNEAL RING; SEGMENT IMPLANTATION; FEMTOSECOND LASER; INTACS; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfo.2016.01.006
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Introduction. Intrastromat corneal rings (ICR) have been used for several years for the correction of irregular astigmatism in patients with keratoconus. Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of femtosecond-assisted ICR implantation for treatment of keratoconus and to define predictive factors of success. Patients and methods. We undertook a retrospective study of patients with keratoconus who underwent femtosecond-assisted Ferrara ICR implantation between December 2012 and May 2014 at the University Hospital of Besancon. To determinate predictive factors of success, we divided patients into 2 groups based on the gain of at least two lines of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1 year after surgery ("good responders") or the gain of only one line of BCVA, no change, or the loss of lines of BCVA ("poor responders"). For each group, we analyzed preoperative refractive and keratometric values. Moreover, to verify if preoperative visual acuity could be a predictive factor of success, four groups were created based on initial visual acuity, and postoperative BCVA was compared. Results. We retrospectively studied 32 eyes of 29 patients with keratoconus who underwent femtosecond-assisted Ferrara ICR implantation between December 2012 and May 2014 at the University Hospital of Besancon. From one month to 1 year postoperatively, we observed a significant improvement in BCVA and a significant decrease in cylinder and keratometry values (P< 0.05). In total, 90.6% of patients had an increase in visual acuity (VA) of at least one line within 1 year while 9.4% had a decrease or stability of their VA. The average cylinder value decreased from 4.81+ 2.45 diopters (D) preoperatively to 2.39 1.94 D (P < 0.001) at 1 year postoperatively, and the average of the maximum keratometry from 51.14 + 3.89 D to 48.52 4.00 D (P < 0.05). Four predictive factors of success were statistically significant: type of ectasia (type 1 or 2), stage of keratoconus (Krumeich 1 or 2), implantation of only 1 ICR and a preoperative VA less than 0.4 (decimal scale). Eighty-six percent of patients with an initial VA< 0.4 (decimal scale) gained 2 lines of BCVA within 1 year and 80% 3 lines versus 52% and 41%, respectively for patients with initial VA > 0.4 (decimal scale). Conclusion. Femtosecond-assisted Ferrara ICR implantation for treatment of keratoconus is a reliable and reversible technique. Implantation results in greater efficiency for patients with moderately advanced asymmetric keratoconus with an initial VA< 0.4 (decimal scale). (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 436
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation for the Treatment of Keratoconus
    Kubaloglu, Anil
    Sari, Esin Sogutlu
    Cinar, Yasin
    Koytak, Arif
    Kurnaz, Ekrem
    Ozerturk, Yusuf
    CORNEA, 2011, 30 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [2] Continuous Corneal Intrastromal Ring Implantation for Treatment of Keratoconus in an Iranian Population
    Jabbarvand, Mahmoud
    Salamatrad, Ahmad
    Hashemian, Hesam
    Khodaparast, Mehdi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 155 (05) : 837 - 842
  • [3] Clinical Outcomes of a New Type of Continuous Intrastromal Corneal Ring for Treatment of Keratoconus
    Jabbarvand, Mahmoud
    Ahmadzadeh, Hooman
    Khodaparast, Mehdi
    Jamali, Alireza
    Aghamirsalim, Mohamadreza
    CORNEA, 2022, 41 (04) : 435 - 442
  • [4] Corneal densitometry in patients with keratoconus undergoing intrastromal Ferrara ring implantation
    Rodrigues, Pablo Felipe
    Moscovici, Bernardo Kaplan
    Ferrara, Guilherme
    Lamazales, Luciano
    Freitas, Marcela Mara Silva
    Torquetti, Leonardo
    Ambrosio, Renato
    Gomes, Jose Alvaro Pereira
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 31 (06) : 3505 - 3510
  • [5] Refractive and Visual Outcomes After Intacs vs Ferrara Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation for Keratoconus: A Comparative Study
    Kaya, Vedat
    Utine, Canan Asli
    Karakus, Sezen Harmanci
    Kavadarli, Isilay
    Yilmaz, Omer Faruk
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 27 (12) : 907 - 912
  • [6] Femtosecond-assisted intrastromal corneal ring implantation for keratoconus treatment: a comparison with crosslinking combination
    Von Harbach Ferenczy, Peter Alexander
    Dalcegio, Maiara
    Koehler, Marcela
    Pereira, Thiago Silveira
    Moreira, Hamilton
    Moreira, Luciane Bugmann
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2015, 78 (02) : 76 - 81
  • [7] Tomographic Findings After Implantation of Ferrara Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus
    Lyra, Joao Marcelo
    Lyra, Daniela
    Ribeiro, Guilherme
    Torquetti, Leonardo
    Ferrara, Paulo
    Machado, Aydano
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 33 (02) : 110 - +
  • [8] Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Before Ferrara Intrastromal Corneal Ring Implantation for the Treatment of Progressive Keratoconus
    Henriquez, Maria A.
    Izquierdo, Luis, Jr.
    Bernilla, Cesar
    McCarthy, Martin
    CORNEA, 2012, 31 (07) : 740 - 745
  • [9] Acute corneal hydrops after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for keratoconus
    Gueell, Jose L.
    Verdaguer, Paula
    Elies, Daniel
    Gris, Oscar
    Manero, Felicidad
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 38 (12) : 2192 - 2195
  • [10] Evaluation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for treatment of keratoconus with a mechanical implantation technique
    Tunc, Zeki
    Helvacioglu, Firat
    Sencan, Sadik
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 61 (05) : 218 - 225