Quality of analgesia after lower third molar surgery: A randomised, double-blind study of levobupivacaine, bupivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine

被引:7
作者
Brajkovic, Denis [1 ]
Biocanin, Vladimir [2 ]
Milic, Marija [3 ]
Vucetic, Milan [3 ]
Petrovic, Renata [4 ]
Brkovic, Bozidar [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kragujevac, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Fac Med, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
[2] Univ Kragujevac, Dept Oral Surg, Fac Med, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
[3] Univ Belgrade, Clin Oral Surg, Fac Med Dent, Belgrade, Serbia
[4] Univ Belgrade, Dept Restorat Dent & Endodont, Fac Med Dent, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
tooth extraction; molar; third; bupivacaine; lidocaine; anesthesia; dental; pain; postoperative; questionaires; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF; BRACHIAL-PLEXUS BLOCK; SURGICAL REMOVAL; STEREOSELECTIVE BLOCK; NERVE BLOCK; TOXICITY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.2298/VSP1501050B
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Aim. Surgical extraction of lower third molars is followed by mild or severe postoperative pain which peaks at maximal intensity in the first 12 hours and has a significant impact on a patient's postoperative quality of life. The use of long-acting local anaesthetics is a promising strategy to improve postoperative analgesia. The aim of the present study was to investigate analgesic parameters and patient satisfaction after using 0.5% levobupivacaine (Lbup), 0.5% bupivacaine (Bup) and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:80,000 (Lid + Epi) for an inferior alveolar nerve block following lower third molar surgery. Methods. A total of 102 patients (ASA I) were divided into three groups, each of which received either 3 mL of Lbup, Bup or Lid + Epi. The intensity of postoperative analgesia was measured using a verbal rating scale (VRS). The total amounts of rescue analgesics were recorded on the first and during seven postoperative days. Patients satisfaction was noted using a modified verbal scales. Results. A significantly higher level of postoperative pain was recorded in Lid + Epi group compared to Bup and Lbup groups. No significant differences were seen between Bup and Lbup, but a significant reduction in the need for rescue analgesics was seen post-operatively in both Lbup and Bup (50%) in comparison with Lid + Epi (80%) in the first 24 hours. The same significant trend in rescue analgesic consumption was recorded for seven postoperative days. Patients' overall satisfaction was significantly lower for Lid + Epi (10%) than for Lbup (56%) and Bup (52%). Conclusion. The use of a new and long-acting local anaesthetic 0.5% levobupivacaine is clinically relevant and effective for an inferior alveolar nerve block and postoperative pain control after third molar surgery. In our study Lbup and Bup controled postoperative pain more efficiently after lower third molar surgery compared to Lid + Epi.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 56
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers [J].
Bardsley, H ;
Gristwood, R ;
Baker, H ;
Watson, N ;
Nimmo, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 46 (03) :245-249
[2]   Inability to work after surgical removal of mandibular third molars [J].
Berge, TI .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 55 (01) :64-69
[3]   Bupivacaine versus lidocaine for third molar surgery: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study [J].
Bouloux, GF ;
Punnia-Moorthy, A .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 57 (05) :510-514
[4]   A double-blind comparison of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 0.5% levobupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine for the inferior alveolar nerve block [J].
Branco, FP ;
Ranali, J ;
Ambrosano, GMB ;
Volpato, MC .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2006, 101 (04) :442-447
[5]   REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND LOCAL ANESTHETIC-INDUCED SYSTEMIC TOXICITY - SEIZURE FREQUENCY AND ACCOMPANYING CARDIOVASCULAR CHANGES [J].
BROWN, DL ;
RANSOM, DM ;
HALL, JA ;
LEICHT, CH ;
SCHROEDER, DR ;
OFFORD, KP .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (02) :321-328
[6]   Clinical properties of levobupivacaine or racemic bupivacaine for sciatic nerve block [J].
Casati, A ;
Chelly, JE ;
Cerchierini, E ;
Santorsola, R ;
Nobili, F ;
Grispigni, C ;
Di Benedetto, P ;
Torri, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2002, 14 (02) :111-114
[7]   Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? [J].
Casati, Andrea ;
Putzu, Marta .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (02) :247-268
[8]   Tolerability of large-dose intravenous levobupivacaine in sheep [J].
Chang, DHT ;
Ladd, LA ;
Wilson, KA ;
Gelgor, L ;
Mather, LE .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (03) :671-679
[9]   Comparison of S(-)-bupivacaine with racemic (RS)-bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block [J].
Cox, CR ;
Checketts, MR ;
Mackenzie, N ;
Scott, NB ;
Bannister, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 80 (05) :594-598
[10]  
Crincoli V, 2009, J OROFAC PAIN, V23, P325