Implants placed in an irradiated dog mandible:: A morphometric analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Brogniez, V
D'Hoore, W
Grégoire, V
Munting, E
Reychler, H
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Catholic Univ Louvain, St Luc Univ Hosp, Sch Publ Hlth, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Catholic Univ Louvain, St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[5] Catholic Univ Louvain, St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
dental implants; dogs; endosseous dental implantation; irradiation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The objective of this research was to evaluate the influence of radiotherapy on the osseointegration of oral implants in a canine model. After the extraction of all mandibular premolars and first and second molars, 11 male beagles were divided into 3 groups. The control group (3 dogs) received no radiation. The second group (4 dogs) was irradiated 4 weeks after implantation. The third group (4 dogs) was irradiated 8 weeks before implantation. Eight implants were placed in each dog, in an alternating pattern: 4 non-submerged ITI Bonefit titanium plasma spray-coated and 4 submerged Steri-Oss hydroxyapatite-coated. The irradiated dogs received 4.3 Gy daily for 10 days. After 6 months of osseointegration, The dogs were sacrificed and each hemimandible was dissected to isolate the implants. Quantification of the extent of the direct bone-implant contact was carried out by scanning electron microscopy backscattered electron images that reproduced each implant in its entirety, using a digitizing table connected to a computer. The results were expressed as a percentage of direct bone-implant contact Versus total perimeter accessible to bone. The bone contact percentage for the control group was 87% for Steri-Oss implants and 69% for the ITI Benefit implants; for the animals irradiated after implantation, the percentages were 82 for Steri-Oss implants and 58 for ITI Bonefit implants; and for the animals irradiated before implantation, the percentages were 62 for Steri-Oss implants and 28 for ITI Benefit implants, A statistically significant difference appeared between the 2 types of implants (P < .001). A statistically significant difference was also seen between the 3 groups for both types of implants, except between the control group and the group irradiated after implantation (P = .14). This indicates that, overall, the timing of irradiation influences osseointegration. Osseointegration is possible before and after radiotherapy; however, the direct bone-implant contact increased when the implants were placed before irradiation.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 518
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implants placed in irradiated dog's mandible: morphometric examination
    Brogniez, V
    D'Hoore, W
    Gregoire, V
    Pecheur, A
    Smitz, P
    Reychler, H
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 970 - 970
  • [2] A Prosthetic Solution to Poorly Placed Implants in the Posterior Mandible
    de Oliveira Treml, Michele Albino
    Schenkel, Laerte Balduino
    Schuldt Filho, Guenther
    CASE REPORTS IN DENTISTRY, 2018, 2018
  • [3] Calcified tissues histogenesis around dental implants placed in irradiated dog's mandibles.
    Brogniez, V
    Lengele, B
    Gregoire, V
    Reychler, H
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 558 - 558
  • [4] Implants in the irradiated Mandible after temporary Mandibulotomy
    Esser, E.
    MKG-CHIRURG, 2008, 1 (01): : 57 - 58
  • [5] Endosseous implants in the irradiated and non irradiated mandible following oncologic surgery
    Esser, E
    Vosshans, J
    Huemmeke, S
    Wagner, W
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 1 (01) : 110 - 110
  • [6] TITANIUM IMPLANTS IN IRRADIATED DOG MANDIBLES
    SCHWEIGER, JW
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1989, 62 (02): : 201 - 205
  • [7] Histological analysis of loaded zirconia and titanium dental implants: an experimental study in the dog mandible
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Benic, Goran I.
    Munoz, Fernando
    Kohal, Ralf
    Martin, Ignacio Sanz
    Cantalapiedra, Antonio Gonzalez
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Jung, Ronald E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2015, 42 (10) : 967 - 975
  • [8] Dental prosthetic reconstruction of osseointegrated implants placed in irradiated bone
    Brogniez, V
    Lejuste, P
    Pecheur, A
    Reychler, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1998, 13 (04) : 506 - 512
  • [9] Immediate loading of branemark system Implants®:: A comparison between TiUnite™ and turned implants placed in the anterior mandible
    Froberg, Kjell-Krister
    Lindh, Christina
    Ericsson, Ingvar
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (04) : 187 - 197
  • [10] Comparison of submerged and nonsubmerged implants placed without flap reflection in the canine mandible
    Choi, Byung-Ho
    Li, Jingxu
    Kim, Han-Sung
    Ko, Chang-Yong
    Jeong, Seung-Mi
    Xuan, Feng
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2008, 105 (05): : 561 - 565