Ammonia emissions from pig slurries: evaluation of acidification and the use of additives in reducing losses

被引:0
作者
Martinez, J [1 ]
Jolivet, J [1 ]
Guiziou, F [1 ]
Langeoire, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Cemagref, F-35044 Rennes, France
来源
AMMONIA AND ODOUR EMISSIONS FROM ANIMAL PRODUCTION FACILITIES, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2 | 1997年
关键词
additives; ammonia; emission; laboratory; field;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Ammonia emissions during storage of pig slurry were followed through laboratory experiments to evaluate several chemical and commercial additives on decreasing losses. A series of cylindrical columns of 5 cm depth and 10 cm diameter were used to simulate a column of slurry stored in a pit. Each glass volatilization chamber contained 300 g of raw or chemically treated pig slurry. During the experiment the ammonia-charged air was drawn out of the lid and entered the chemical trap (0.1 N sulphuric acid or 4% boric acid) at a flow rate of 5 litres/min (about 8-10 exchange volumes/min). Five commercial chemical additives (Stalosan, De-odorase, odorless, biosuper and NX23) were used at three Fates (low, recommended and high) to evaluate their performances on ammonia losses. Strong acids and calcium chloride were evaluated concurrently to the pit additives. Two commercials additives from the five tested had an effect on reducing ammonia losses. The emissions from the slurries treated with these two additives were reduced by approximately 40% to 50% in comparison to emissions from the untreated slurries. Both the addition of calcium chloride and the acidification of slurries to pH 6 gave an 85% reduction in the ammonia lost. Results obtained from those laboratory experiments were confirmed in field trials using a wind tunnel system.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 492
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A whole-farm assessment of the efficacy of slurry acidification in reducing ammonia emissions
    Kai, P.
    Pedersen, P.
    Jensen, J. E.
    Hansen, M. N.
    Sommer, S. G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2008, 28 (02) : 148 - 154
  • [2] Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from pig slurry by acidification with organic and inorganic acids
    Dalby, Frederik R.
    Guldberg, Lise B.
    Feilberg, Anders
    Kofoed, Michael V. W.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (05):
  • [3] Evaluation of the efficacy of amendment types and rates in reducing ammonia emissions from broiler litter
    Poudel, Sabina
    Chakraborty, Debolina
    Prasad, Rishi
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2024, 103 (12)
  • [4] The Use of Natural Sorbents to Reduce Ammonia Emissions from Cattle Faeces
    Szymula, Agnieszka
    Wlazlo, Lukasz
    Sasakova, Nad'a
    Wnuk, Wioletta
    Nowakowicz-Debek, Bozena
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [5] Ammonia volatilization from different pig slurries applied on wheat stubble using different land spreading techniques under French conditions
    Laurence, Loyon
    Fabrice, Guiziou
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 280 : 114 - 117
  • [6] Odour and ammonia emissions from intensive pig units in Ireland
    Hayes, ET
    Curran, TP
    Dodd, VA
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 97 (07) : 940 - 948
  • [7] Field evaluation of biofilters in reducing aerial pollutant emissions from a commercial pig finishing building
    Lim, Teng-Teeh
    Jin, Yaomin
    Ni, Ji-Qin
    Heber, Albert J.
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2012, 112 (03) : 192 - 201
  • [8] Surface oxidation for reducing ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from dairy manure storage
    Xue, SK
    Chen, SL
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1999, 42 (05): : 1401 - 1408
  • [9] A FARM SCALE STUDY ON THE USE OF DE-ODORASE(R) FOR REDUCING ODOR AND AMMONIA EMISSIONS FROM INTENSIVE FATTENING PIGGERIES
    AMON, M
    DOBEIC, M
    MISSELBROOK, TH
    PAIN, BF
    PHILLIPS, VR
    SNEATH, RW
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 51 (2-3) : 163 - 169
  • [10] Acidification of manure reduces gaseous emissions and nutrient losses from subsequent composting process
    Cao, Yubo
    Wang, Xuan
    Liu, Ling
    Velthof, Gerard L.
    Misselbrook, Tom
    Bai, Zhaohai
    Ma, Lin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 264 (264)