A Penalized Likelihood Method for Structural Equation Modeling

被引:80
|
作者
Huang, Po-Hsien [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Hung [1 ]
Weng, Li-Jen [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
structural equation modeling; penalized likelihood; ECM algorithm; oracle property; model selection; factor analysis model; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELS; MIXED-EFFECTS MODELS; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; VARIABLE SELECTION; CROSS-VALIDATION; SPARSE; REGRESSION; IDENTIFIABILITY; ESTIMATORS; SHRINKAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s11336-017-9566-9
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
A penalized likelihood (PL) method for structural equation modeling (SEM) was proposed as a methodology for exploring the underlying relations among both observed and latent variables. Compared to the usual likelihood method, PL includes a penalty term to control the complexity of the hypothesized model. When the penalty level is appropriately chosen, the PL can yield an SEM model that balances the model goodness-of-fit and model complexity. In addition, the PL results in a sparse estimate that enhances the interpretability of the final model. The proposed method is especially useful when limited substantive knowledge is available for model specifications. The PL method can be also understood as a methodology that links the traditional SEM to the exploratory SEM (Asparouhov & Muth,n in Struct Equ Model Multidiscipl J 16:397-438, 2009). An expectation-conditional maximization algorithm was developed to maximize the PL criterion. The asymptotic properties of the proposed PL were also derived. The performance of PL was evaluated through a numerical experiment, and two real data illustrations were presented to demonstrate its utility in psychological research.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 354
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Regularized Structural Equation Modeling
    Jacobucci, Ross
    Grimm, Kevin J.
    McArdle, John J.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (04) : 555 - 566
  • [22] A penalized quasi-maximum likelihood method for variable selection in the spatial autoregressive model
    Liu, Xuan
    Chen, Jianbao
    Cheng, Suli
    SPATIAL STATISTICS, 2018, 25 : 86 - 104
  • [23] Partial penalized empirical likelihood ratio test under sparse case
    Wang, Shan-shan
    Cui, Heng-jian
    ACTA MATHEMATICAE APPLICATAE SINICA-ENGLISH SERIES, 2017, 33 (02): : 327 - 344
  • [24] Comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian Regularization in Structural Equation Modeling
    Jacobucci, Ross
    Grimm, Kevin J.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (04) : 639 - 649
  • [25] Fast selection of nonlinear mixed effect models using penalized likelihood
    Ollier, Edouard
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2022, 167
  • [26] Outlier detection and robust mixture modeling using nonconvex penalized likelihood
    Yu, Chun
    Chen, Kun
    Yao, Weixin
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2015, 164 : 27 - 38
  • [27] PENALIZED JACKKNIFE EMPIRICAL LIKELIHOOD IN HIGH DIMENSIONS
    Li, Zhouping
    Xu, Jinfeng
    Zhao, Na
    Zhou, Wang
    STATISTICA SINICA, 2023, 33 : 1219 - 1232
  • [28] Variable selection using penalized empirical likelihood
    Ren YunWen
    Zhang XinSheng
    SCIENCE CHINA-MATHEMATICS, 2011, 54 (09) : 1829 - 1845
  • [29] Penalized high-dimensional empirical likelihood
    Tang, Cheng Yong
    Leng, Chenlei
    BIOMETRIKA, 2010, 97 (04) : 905 - 919
  • [30] Hypothesis testing via a penalized-likelihood approach
    Quynh Van Nong
    Ng, Chi Tim
    Lee, Woojoo
    Lee, Youngjo
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 48 (02) : 265 - 277