Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) in Glufosinate-Resistant Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]

被引:14
作者
Barnes, Ethann R. [1 ]
Knezevic, Stevan Z. [2 ]
Sikkema, Peter H. [3 ]
Lindquist, John L. [1 ]
Jhala, Amit J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Northeast Res & Extens Ctr, Haskell Agr Lab, Concord, NE USA
[3] Univ Guelph Ridgetown, Dept Plant Agr, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
来源
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE | 2017年 / 8卷
关键词
gross profit margin; herbicide efficacy; residual herbicides; tank-mixture; weed resistance; WATERHEMP AMARANTHUS-RUDIS; HERBICIDE PROGRAMS; WEED-CONTROL; CORN; INTERFERENCE; MANAGEMENT; TILLAGE; TRIFIDA; CONFIRMATION; YIELD;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2017.01455
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Common ragweed emerges early in the season in Nebraska, USA and is competitive with soybean; therefore, preplant herbicides are important for effective control. Glyphosate has been used as a preplant control option; however, confirmation of glyphosate-resistant (GR) common ragweed in Nebraska necessitates evaluating other herbicide options. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the efficacy of preplant (PP) herbicides followed by (fb) glufosinate alone or in tank-mixture with imazethapyr, acetochlor, or S-metolachlor applied post-emergence (POST) for control of GR common ragweed in glufosinate-resistant soybean; (2) their effect on common ragweed density, biomass, and soybean yield; and (3) the partial economics of herbicide programs. A field experiment was conducted in a grower's field infested with GR common ragweed in Gage County, Nebraska, USA in 2015 and 2016. Preplant herbicide programs containing glufosinate, paraquat, 2,4-D, dimethenamid-P, cloransulam-methyl, or high rates of flumioxazin plus chlorimuron-ethyl provided 90-99% control of common ragweed at 21 d after treatment (DAT). The aforementioned PP herbicides fb a POST application of glufosinate alone or in tank-mixture with imazethapyr, acetochlor, or S-metolachlor controlled GR common ragweed 84-98% at soybean harvest, reduced common ragweed density (<= 20 plants m(-2)) and biomass by >= 93%, and secured soybean yield 1,819-2,158 kg ha(-1). The PP fb POST herbicide programs resulted in the highest gross profit margins (US$373-US$506) compared to PP alone (US$91) or PRE fb POST programs (US$158). The results of this study conclude that effective and economical control of GR common ragweed in glufosinate-resistant soybean is achievable with PP fb POST herbicide programs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, LIBERTY 280 HERBICID, P43
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, LIBERTY 280 HERBICID, P28
  • [3] Comparison of Glufosinate-Based Herbicide Programs for Broad-Spectrum Weed Control in Glufosinate-Resistant Soybean
    Aulakh, Jatinder S.
    Jhala, Amit J.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (03) : 419 - 430
  • [4] Glyphosate-Resistant Italian Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) Populations also Exhibit Resistance to Glufosinate
    Avila-Garcia, Wilson V.
    Mallory-Smith, Carol
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2011, 59 (03) : 305 - 309
  • [5] Influence of Tillage on Common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) Emergence Pattern in Nebraska
    Barnes, Ethann R.
    Werle, Rodrigo
    Sandell, Lowell D.
    Lindquist, John L.
    Knezevic, Stevan Z.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    Jhala, Amit J.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (04) : 623 - 631
  • [6] BIOLOGY OF CANADIAN WEEDS .11. AMBROSIA-ARTEMISIIFOLIA L AND A-PSILOSTACHYA DC
    BASSETT, IJ
    CROMPTON, CW
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1975, 55 (02) : 463 - 476
  • [7] Clewis SB, 2001, WEED SCI, V49, P768, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0768:CRIIP]2.0.CO
  • [8] 2
  • [9] COMMON RAGWEED (AMBROSIA-ARTEMISIIFOLIA) INTERFERENCE IN SOYBEANS (GLYCINE-MAX)
    COBLE, HD
    WILLIAMS, FM
    RITTER, RL
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 1981, 29 (03) : 339 - 342
  • [10] Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac, and sulfosate
    Corbett, JL
    Askew, SD
    Thomas, WE
    Wilcut, JW
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 18 (02) : 443 - 453