A quality improvement initiative to optimize dosing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis

被引:8
作者
Caruso, Thomas J. [1 ]
Wang, Ellen [1 ]
Schwenk, Hayden T. [2 ]
Scheinker, David [3 ]
Yeverino, Calida [4 ]
Tweedy, Mary [5 ]
Maheru, Manjit [4 ]
Sharek, Paul J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Lucile Packard Childrens Hosp Stanford, Div Pediat Anesthesiol, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med,Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Pediat, Lucile Packard Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Infect Dis,Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Lucile Packard Childrens Hosp Stanford, Dept Pharm Serv, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Lucile Packard Childrens Hosp Stanford, Dept Perioperat Serv, Stanford, CA USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Dept Pediat, Sch Med, Lucile Packard Childrens Hosp, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
antibiotic prophylaxis; surgical wound infection; cefazolin; anti-infective agents; antibacterial agents; risk factors; SITE INFECTIONS; GUIDELINES; REDUCTION; ADHERENCE; HOSPITALS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1111/pan.13137
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The risk of surgical site infections is reduced with appropriate timing and dosing of preoperative antimicrobials. Based on evolving national guidelines, we increased the preoperative dose of cefazolin from 25 to 30 mg.kg(-1). This quality improvement project describes an improvement initiative to develop standard work processes to ensure appropriate dosing. Aims: The primary aim was to deliver cefazolin 30 mg . kg(-1) to at least 90% of indicated patients. The secondary aim was to determine differences between accuracy of cefazolin doses when given as an electronic order compared to a verbal order. Methods: Data were collected from January 1, 2012 to May 31, 2016. A quality improvement team of perioperative physicians, nurses, and pharmacists implemented a series of interventions including new electronic medical record order sets, personal provider antibiotic dose badges, and utilization of pharmacists to prepare antibiotics to increase compliance with the recommended dose. Process compliance was measured using a statistical process control chart, and dose compliance was measured through electronic analysis of the electronic medical record. Secondary aim data were displayed as percentage of dose compliance. An unpaired t-test was used to determine differences between groups. Results: Between January 1, 2012 and May 31, 2016, cefazolin was administered to 9086 patients. The mean compliance of cefazolin at 30 mg.kg(-1) from May 2013 to March 2014 was 40%, which prompted initiation of this project. From April 2014 to May 2016, a series of interventions were deployed. The mean compliance from September 2015 to May 2016 was 93% with significantly reduced variation and no special cause variation, indicating that the process was in control at the target primary aim. There were 649 cefazolin administrations given verbally and 1929 given with an electronic order between October 1, 2014 and May 31, 2016. During this time period, the rate of compliance of administering cefazolin at 30 mg.kg(-1) was significantly higher when given after an electronic order than when given verbally, 94% vs 76%. Conclusion: This comprehensive quality improvement project improved practitioner compliance with evidence-based preoperative antimicrobial dosing recommendations to reduce the risk of surgical site infections.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 710
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Adherence to International Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Guidelines in Cardiac Surgery: A Jordanian Study Demonstrates Need for Quality Improvement [J].
Al-Momany, Nairooz H. ;
Al-Bakri, Amal G. ;
Makahleh, Zeid M. ;
Wazaify, Mayyada M. B. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY, 2009, 15 (03) :262-271
[2]  
Anderson DJ, 2014, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V35, P605, DOI [10.1086/676022, 10.1017/S0899823X00193869]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1958, STAT QUAL CONTR HDB, V2nd
[4]   Morbidity and mortality associated with surgical site infections:: results from the 1997-1999 INCISO surveillance [J].
Astagneau, P ;
Rioux, C ;
Golliot, F ;
Brücker, G .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2001, 48 (04) :267-274
[5]  
Bratzler Dale W, 2013, Am J Health Syst Pharm, V70, P195, DOI [10.1089/sur.2013.9999, 10.2146/ajhp120568]
[6]   Use of Lean and Six Sigma Methodology to Improve Operating Room Efficiency in a High-Volume Tertiary-Care Academic Medical Center [J].
Cima, Robert R. ;
Brown, Michael J. ;
Hebl, James R. ;
Moore, Robin ;
Rogers, James C. ;
Kollengode, Anantha ;
Amstutz, Gwendolyn J. ;
Weisbrod, Cheryl A. ;
Narr, Bradly J. ;
Deschamps, Claude .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2011, 213 (01) :83-92
[7]   Lean management systems: creating a culture of continuous quality improvement [J].
Clark, David M. ;
Silvester, Kate ;
Knowles, Simon .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (08) :638-643
[8]  
DelliFraine Jami L, 2010, Qual Manag Health Care, V19, P211, DOI 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181eb140e
[9]  
Grenc MG, 2013, J CHEMOTHER, V18, P38
[10]   Adherence to guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery patients in German hospitals: a multicentre evaluation involving pharmacy interns [J].
Hohmann, C. ;
Eickhoff, C. ;
Radziwill, R. ;
Schulz, M. .
INFECTION, 2012, 40 (02) :131-137