Effect of Various Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods on the Charging of Battery Load Feed by Solar Panel

被引：45

作者：

Gupta, Ankur Kumar ^{[1
]}

Pachauri, Rupendra Kumar ^{[2
]}

Maity, Tanmoy ^{[1
]}

Chauhan, Yogesh K. ^{[3
]}

Mahela, Om Prakash ^{[4
]}

Khan, Baseem ^{[5
]}

Gupta, Pankaj Kumar ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] Indian Inst Technol ISM, Min Machinery Engn Dept, Dhanbad 826004, Bihar, India

[2] Univ Petr & Energy Studies, Sch Engn, Elect & Elect Engn Dept, Dehra Dun 248007, Uttarakhand, India

[3] Kamla Nehru Inst Technol, Elect Engn Dept, Sultanpur 228118, India

[4] Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd, Power Syst Planning Div, Jaipur 302001, Rajasthan, India

[5] Hawassa Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Awasa 05, Ethiopia

[6] IIMT Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Applicat, Meerut 222001, Uttar Pradesh, India

来源：

IEEE ACCESS | 2021年 / 9卷

关键词：

Renewable energy; maximum power point tracking; photovoltaic system; incremental conductance; POWER POINT TRACKING; ALGORITHM; SYSTEM; CONTROLLER; MODEL;

D O I：

10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3091502

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

The presented work in this paper deals with various step sizes used in incremental conductance (INC) related to the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technique. In the solar photovoltaic system, the variable step size selection method for INC is proposed and compared. The MATLAB/Simulink and hardware setup are used for assessing and analyzing step size methods. The variable step size (DVS), fixed step size (DFS) are comprehensively studied and compared. This DVS method is having a lower ON delay time (T-dON) as 148 msec as regard to 164 msec in the DFS method. On the other hand, the lowest peak-peak oscillations in load current as 0.04 amp for DVS as compared to 0.5A for the DFS method, lower peak current as 1.96A for DVS as compare to 2.37A for the DFS method. In this way, the performance of the DVS method is found superior as it is analyzed and compared with the DFS algorithm.

引用

页码：90977 / 90988

页数：12

共 41 条

[31] Murshid S., 2019, INT T ELECTR ENERGY, V29, P1
[32] A modified MPPT control loop for PV/battery-charging system using PI controller optimally tuned with GA
Nafeh, Abd El-Shafy A.
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL MODELLING-ELECTRONIC NETWORKS DEVICES AND FIELDS, 2011, 24 (02) : 111 - 122
[33] Experimental verification of P&O MPPT algorithm with direct control based on Fuzzy logic control using CUK converter
Radjai, Tawfik
Gaubert, Jean Paul
Rahmani, Lazhar
Mekhilef, Saad
[J]. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2015, 25 (12): : 3492 - 3508
[34] Implementation of a modified incremental conductance MPPT algorithm with direct control based on a fuzzy duty cycle change estimator using dSPACE
Radjai, Tawfik
Rahmani, Lazhar
Mekhilef, Saad
Gaubert, Jean Paul
[J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2014, 110 : 325 - 337
[35] Raj A.G. S., 2019, Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, P1
[36] Raj P. Gokul, 2020, Proceedings of ICDMC 2019. Design, Materials, Cryogenics, and Constructions. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (LNME), P1, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-3631-1_1
[37] THEORY OF THE DIRECT COUPLING BETWEEN DC MOTORS AND PHOTO-VOLTAIC SOLAR-ARRAYS
ROGER, JA
[J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 1979, 23 (03) : 193 - 198
[38] Modified variable step incremental-conductance MPPT technique for photovoltaic system
Singh P.
Shukla N.
Gaur P.
[J]. International Journal of Information Technology, 2021, 13 (6) : 2483 - 2490
[39] Improved Differential Evolution-Based MPPT Algorithm Using SEPIC for PV Systems Under Partial Shading Conditions and Load Variation
Tey, Kok Soon
Mekhilef, Saad
Seyedmahmoudian, Mehdi
Horan, Ben
Oo, Amanullah Than
Stojcevski, Alex
[J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 14 (10) : 4322 - 4333
[40] Variable step size fractional incremental conductance for MPPT under changing atmospheric conditions
Usman Khan, Fahad
Gulzar, Muhammad Majid
Sibtain, Daud
Usman, Hafiz Muhammad
Hayat, Aamir
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL MODELLING-ELECTRONIC NETWORKS DEVICES AND FIELDS, 2020, 33 (06)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →