Effect of Various Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods on the Charging of Battery Load Feed by Solar Panel

被引：52

作者：

Gupta, Ankur Kumar ^{[1
]}

Pachauri, Rupendra Kumar ^{[2
]}

Maity, Tanmoy ^{[1
]}

Chauhan, Yogesh K. ^{[3
]}

Mahela, Om Prakash ^{[4
]}

Khan, Baseem ^{[5
]}

Gupta, Pankaj Kumar ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] Indian Inst Technol ISM, Min Machinery Engn Dept, Dhanbad 826004, Bihar, India

[2] Univ Petr & Energy Studies, Sch Engn, Elect & Elect Engn Dept, Dehra Dun 248007, Uttarakhand, India

[3] Kamla Nehru Inst Technol, Elect Engn Dept, Sultanpur 228118, India

[4] Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd, Power Syst Planning Div, Jaipur 302001, Rajasthan, India

[5] Hawassa Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Awasa 05, Ethiopia

[6] IIMT Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Applicat, Meerut 222001, Uttar Pradesh, India

来源：

IEEE ACCESS | 2021年 / 9卷

关键词：

Renewable energy; maximum power point tracking; photovoltaic system; incremental conductance; POWER POINT TRACKING; ALGORITHM; SYSTEM; CONTROLLER; MODEL;

D O I：

10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3091502

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

The presented work in this paper deals with various step sizes used in incremental conductance (INC) related to the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technique. In the solar photovoltaic system, the variable step size selection method for INC is proposed and compared. The MATLAB/Simulink and hardware setup are used for assessing and analyzing step size methods. The variable step size (DVS), fixed step size (DFS) are comprehensively studied and compared. This DVS method is having a lower ON delay time (T-dON) as 148 msec as regard to 164 msec in the DFS method. On the other hand, the lowest peak-peak oscillations in load current as 0.04 amp for DVS as compared to 0.5A for the DFS method, lower peak current as 1.96A for DVS as compare to 2.37A for the DFS method. In this way, the performance of the DVS method is found superior as it is analyzed and compared with the DFS algorithm.

引用

页码：90977 / 90988

页数：12

共 41 条

[1] A NEW MODEL FOR IV CHARACTERISTIC OF SOLAR-CELL GENERATORS AND ITS APPLICATIONS [J].

AKBABA, M ;

ALATTAWI, MAA .

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 1995, 37 (02) :123-132

[2] Analysis on inverter selection for domestic rooftop solar photovoltaic system deployment [J].

Ali, Hayder ;

Khan, Hassan A. .

INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2020, 30 (05)

[3] A FUZZY-LOGIC POWER TRACKING CONTROLLER FOR A PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY-CONVERSION SCHEME [J].

ALTAS, IH ;

SHARAF, AM .

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1992, 25 (03) :227-238

[4]

ALTAS IH, 1991, P 17 ANN C SOL EN SO, P65

[5]

[Anonymous], 2014, DC DC BOOK KNOWLEDGE

[6]

[Anonymous], 2000, P IEEE EUR PHOT SOL

[7]

Babu BC, 2015, 2015 IEEE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (IEEE EEEIC 2015), P1625, DOI 10.1109/EEEIC.2015.7165415

[8]

Bizzarri F, 2019, IEEE I C ELECT CIRC, P859, DOI [10.1109/icecs46596.2019.8964815, 10.1109/ICECS46596.2019.8964815]

[9]

Bruendlinger Roland., 2006, Proc. 21st EUPVSEC, P2157

[10] Soft-Switching Converter With HF Transformer for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems [J].

Cacciato, Mario ;

Consoli, Alfio ;

Attanasio, Rosario ;

Gennaro, Francesco .

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2010, 57 (05) :1678-1686

← 1 2 3 4 5 →