Is more always better? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development

被引:45
作者
Gomes, JFS
de Weerd-Nederhof, PC
Pearson, AW
Cunha, MP
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Technol & Management, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M15 6PB, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Nova Lisboa, Fac Econ, P-1099038 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
new product development; integration; contingent approach; project performance; innovation;
D O I
10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00107-9
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper is to explore the relationship between performance in new product development (hereinafter NPD) and functional integration under different conditions of project uncertainty. Functional integration is conceived as a two-dimensional concept, encompassing a behavioural - collaboration - and a structural - interaction - dimension. This study is based on 92 questionnaires looking at NPD activities in more than 40 British and Dutch companies from various industrial sectors. The results suggest that the nature of the relationship between integration and performance is contingent upon the project stage and the degree of novelty in the new product. Integration in the initial stages of the project assumes a prominent role in the quality of the end product, whereas in later stages it is more associated with time to market than with costs and end product quality. Results further show that the dimension collaboration of integration may be more relevant under circumstances of high new product innovativeness than when minor variations are introduced in a new product. The paper ends with a discussion of the use of universal approaches to NPD management. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 191
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   COMMUNICATION NETWORKS IN R AND D LABORATORIES [J].
ALLEN, TJ ;
SLOAN, AP .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 1970, 1 (01) :14-21
[2]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY
[3]   Balanced matrix structure and new product development process at Texas Instruments Materials and Controls Division [J].
Bernasco, W ;
de Weerd-Nederhof, PC ;
Tillema, H ;
Boer, H .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 1999, 29 (02) :121-131
[4]  
BROCKOFF KK, 2000, READINGS TECHNOLOGY, P9
[5]   The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations [J].
Brown, SL ;
Eisenhardt, KM .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1997, 42 (01) :1-34
[6]   PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT - PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS [J].
BROWN, SL ;
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (02) :343-378
[7]   PRINCIPLES OF NEW PRODUCT MANAGEMENT - EXPLORING THE BELIEFS OF PRODUCT PRACTITIONERS [J].
CALANTONE, RJ ;
DIBENEDETTO, CA ;
HAGGBLOM, T .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1995, 12 (03) :235-247
[8]   Toward the development of benchmarking tools for R&D project management [J].
Coombs, R ;
McMeekin, A ;
Pybus, R .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 1998, 28 (03) :175-186
[9]   STAGE-GATE SYSTEMS - A NEW TOOL FOR MANAGING NEW PRODUCTS [J].
COOPER, RG .
BUSINESS HORIZONS, 1990, 33 (03) :44-54
[10]   From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model [J].
Denison, DR ;
Hart, SL ;
Kahn, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (04) :1005-1023