Different variations in soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes and their responses to edaphic factors along a boreal secondary forest successional trajectory

被引:13
|
作者
Duan, Beixing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cai, Tijiu [1 ,2 ]
Man, Xiuling [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Ruihan [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Minglei [1 ,2 ]
Ge, Zhaoxin [1 ,2 ]
Mencuccini, Maurizio [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Forestry Univ, Sch Forestry, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China
[2] Northeast Forestry Univ, Key Lab Sustainable Forest Ecosyst Management, Minist Educ, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China
[3] CREAF, Barcelona, Cerdanyola Del, Spain
[4] ICREA, Barcelona, Spain
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Secondary forest succession; Greenhouse gas fluxes; Soil properties; Environmental factors; Boreal forest; LAND-USE CHANGE; MICROBIAL BIOMASS; DAXINGAN MOUNTAINS; METHANE OXIDATION; EXTRACTION METHOD; ENZYME-ACTIVITIES; CARBON STOCK; RESPIRATION; EMISSIONS; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155983
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forest succession is an important process regulating the carbon and nitrogen budgets in forest ecosystems. However, little is known about how and extent by which vegetation succession predictably affects soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes, especially in boreal forest. Here, a field study was conducted along a secondary forest succession trajectory from Beuda platyphylla forest (early stage), then Benda platyphylla-Larix grnelinii forest (intermediate stage), to Lcuix gmelinii forest (late stage) to explore the effects of forest succession on soil greenhouse gas fluxes and related soil environmental factors in Northeast China. The results showed significant differences in soil greenhouse gas fluxes during the forest succession. During the study period, the average soil CO2 flux was greatest at mid-successional stage (444.72 mg m(-2) h(-1)), followed by the late (341.81 mg m(-2) h(-1)) and the early-successional (347.12 mg m(-2) h(-1)) stages. The average soil CH4 flux increased significantly during succession, ranging from - 0.062 to -0.036 mg m(-2) h(-1).The average soil N2O flux was measured as 17.95 mu g m(-2) h(-1) at intermediate successional stage, significantly lower than that at late (20.71 mu g m(-2) h(-1)) and early-successional (20.85 mu g m(-2) h(-1)) stages. During forest succession, soil greenhouse gas fluxes showed significant correlations with soil and environmental factors at both seasonal and successional time scales. The seasonal variations of soil GHG fluxes were mainly influenced by soil temperature and water content. Meanwhile, soil MBN and soil NO3--N content were also important factors for soil N2O fluxes. Structural equation modelling showed that forest succession affected soil CO2 fluxes by changing soil temperature and microbial biomass carbon, affected soil CH4 fluxes mainly by changing soil water content and soil pH value, and affected soil N2O fluxes mainly by changing soil temperature, microbial biomass nitrogen, and soil NO3--N content. Our study suggests that forest succession mainly alters soil nutrient and soil environment/chemical properties affecting soil CO2 and N2O fluxes and soil CH4 fluxes, respectively, in the secondary forest succession process.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Boreal forest soil CO2 and CH4 fluxes following fire and their responses to experimental warming and drying
    Song, Xiaoyan
    Wang, Genxu
    Hu, Zhaoyong
    Ran, Fei
    Chen, Xiaopeng
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 644 : 862 - 872
  • [2] Soil-atmosphere CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes in boreal forestry-drained peatlands
    Ojanen, Paavo
    Minkkinen, Kari
    Alm, Jukka
    Penttila, Timo
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 260 (03) : 411 - 421
  • [3] Post-fire soil fluxes of CO2, CH4 and N2O along the Colorado Front Range
    Gathany, Mark A.
    Burke, Ingrid C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2011, 20 (07) : 838 - 846
  • [4] Soil-atmosphere fluxes of CO2, CH4, and N2O across an experimentally-grown, successional gradient of biocrust community types
    Richardson, Andrew D.
    Kong, Gary, V
    Taylor, Katrina M.
    Le Moine, James M.
    Bowker, Matthew A.
    Barber, Jarrett J.
    Basler, David
    Carbone, Mariah S.
    Hayer, Michaela
    Koch, George W.
    Salvatore, Mark R.
    Sonnemaker, A. Wesley
    Trilling, David E.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [5] Contrasting effects of reindeer grazing on CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes originating from the northern boreal forest floor
    Koster, Kajar
    Koster, Egle
    Berninger, Frank
    Heinonsalo, Jussi
    Pumpanen, Jukka
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 29 (02) : 374 - 381
  • [6] CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes from soil of a burned grassland in Central Africa
    Castaldi, S.
    de Grandcourt, A.
    Rasile, A.
    Skiba, U.
    Valentini, R.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2010, 7 (11) : 3459 - 3471
  • [7] Short-term effects of thinning on soil CO2, N2O and CH4 fluxes in Mediterranean forest ecosystems
    Mazza, Gianluigi
    Agnelli, Alessandro E.
    Cantiani, Paolo
    Chiavetta, Ugo
    Doukalianou, Foteini
    Kitikidou, Kyriaki
    Milios, Elias
    Orfanoudakis, Michail
    Radoglou, Kalliopi
    Lagomarsino, Alessandra
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 651 : 713 - 724
  • [8] Spatiotemporal variability of CO2, N2O and CH4 fluxes from a semi-deciduous tropical forest soil in the Congo Basin
    Daelman, Roxanne
    Bauters, Marijn
    Barthel, Matti
    Bulonza, Emmanuel
    Lefevre, Lodewijk
    Mbifo, Jose
    Six, Johan
    Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus
    Wolf, Benjamin
    Kiese, Ralf
    Boeckx, Pascal
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2025, 22 (06) : 1529 - 1542
  • [9] Soil N2O, CH4, and CO2 Fluxes in Forest, Grassland, and Tillage/No-Tillage Croplands in French Guiana (Amazonia)
    Petitjean, Caroline
    Le Gall, Cecile
    Pontet, Celia
    Fujisaki, Kenji
    Garric, Bernard
    Horth, Jean-Claude
    Henault, Catherine
    Perrin, Anne-Sophie
    SOIL SYSTEMS, 2019, 3 (02) : 1 - 20
  • [10] Effects of clear-fell harvesting on soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes in an upland Sitka spruce stand in England
    Yamulki, Sirwan
    Forster, Jack
    Xenakis, Georgios
    Ash, Adam
    Brunt, Jacqui
    Perks, Mike
    Morison, James I. L.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2021, 18 (13) : 4227 - 4241