Implementation of the challenge-based learning approach in Academic Engineering Programs

被引:25
作者
Membrillo-Hernandez, Jorge [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Jesus Ramirez-Cadena, Miguel [1 ]
Ramirez-Medrano, Alicia [4 ]
Garcia-Castelan, Rosa M. G. [1 ]
Garcia-Garcia, Rebeca [4 ]
机构
[1] Tecnol Monterrey, Escuela Ingn & Ciencias, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Tecnol Monterrey, Inst Future Educ, Monterrey, Mexico
[3] Tecnol Monterrey, Vicerrectoria Invest & Transferencia Tecnol, Writing Lab, Tec Labs, Monterrey, Mexico
[4] Tecnol Monterrey, Escuela Ingn & Ciencias, Monterrey, Mexico
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING - IJIDEM | 2021年 / 15卷 / 2-3期
关键词
Tec21 Educational Model; Challenge-based Learning; FIT courses; Educational Innovation; Higher Education; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s12008-021-00755-3
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In a world that changes very fast, it is necessary that educational models evolve at the same speed and that teachers are increasingly prepared and open to deal with current problems. Tecnologico de Monterrey has implemented the Tec21 Educational Model based on four fundamental pillars: (a) Challenge-Based Learning (CBL); (b) flexibility; (c) trained, inspiring teachers, and (d) memorable, integrated educational experiences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of the implementation of CBL experiences in two engineering areas within the campus, namely, Mechatronics and Biotechnology. In this article, we first present how a group of teachers adopted CBL as a teaching technique, and second, we describe the implementation of flexible education with external training partners using CBL in "FIT" (Flexible Technology, Interactive) courses. We also analyze various ways to assess the impact of digital technology tools like CANVAS, REMIND, ZOOM, and eLUMEN on competencies. The results of this research indicated that students acquire more knowledge in CBL classes; however, the teachers require an adequate training program and must have previously designed proficiency assessment instruments. The testing of various evaluation instruments found that checklists and evaluation rubrics were the most suitable, objective, and transparent in CBL classes, according to the surveys of teachers and students.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 298
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Learning together: Kolb's experiential theory and its application
    Akella, Devi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION, 2010, 16 (01) : 100 - 112
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, Challenge Based Learning: Take action and make a difference
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, OBS ED INNOV, P1
  • [4] Arter J., 2002, UNDERSTANDING SCORIN
  • [5] Arter JA., 2000, Scoring Rubrics in the Classroom: Using Performance Criteria for Assessing and Improving Student Performance
  • [6] Carey L.M., 2001, Measuring and evaluating school learning, V4th
  • [7] Teaching and Learning Microbiology for Engineers in a Digital World: The Case of the FIT Courses at the Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico
    Castillo-Reyna, Josefina
    Garcia-Garcia, Rebeca M.
    Ramirez-Medrano, Alicia
    Reyes-Millan, Maribell
    Benavente-Vazquez, Blanca R.
    Chamorro-Urroz, Claudia D.
    Membrillo-Hernandez, Jorge
    [J]. CHALLENGES OF THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN EDUCATION, ICL2018, VOL 1, 2020, 916 : 914 - 922
  • [8] Can We Apply Learning Analytics Tools in Challenge Based Learning Contexts?
    Conde, Miguel A.
    Garcia-Penalvo, Francisco J.
    Fidalgo-Blanco, Angel
    Luisa Sein-Echaluce, Maria
    [J]. LEARNING AND COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGIES: TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, LCT 2017, PT II, 2017, 10296 : 242 - 256
  • [9] Delors J., 1996, ED ENCIERRA TESORO
  • [10] Diaz Barriga F., 2006, ENSENANZA SITUADA