A cross-sectional comparison of the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children

被引:62
作者
Hoover, Jill R. [1 ]
Storkel, Holly L. [2 ]
Hogan, Tiffany P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Speech Language Hearing Sci & Disorders, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Dept Special Educ & Commun Disorders, Lincoln, NE USA
关键词
Word learning; Vocabulary; Phonotactic probability; Neighborhood density; Preschool children; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; SERIAL-RECALL; ACQUISITION; ACTIVATION; WORDLIKENESS; PERCEPTION; LENGTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.003
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Two experiments examined the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word learning by 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children. Nonwords orthogonally varying in probability and density were taught with learning and retention measured via picture naming. Experiment 1 used a within story probability/across story density exposure context. Experiment 2 used an across story probability/within story density exposure context. Results showed that probability and density interacted to create optimal learning conditions. Specifically, rare/sparse sound sequences appeared to facilitate triggering of word learning. In contrast, the optimal convergence for lexical configuration and engagement was dependent on exposure context. In particular, common sound sequences and dense neighborhoods were optimal when density was manipulated across stories, whereas rare sound sequences and sparse neighborhoods were optimal when density was manipulated within a story. Taken together, children's phonological and lexical representations were hypothesized to be interdependent on one another resulting in a convergence of form characteristics for optimal word learning. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 116
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, GOLDMAN FRISTOE TEST
[2]  
*ASHA, 1997, GUID AUD SCREEN, pA74
[3]  
AUER ET, 1993, THESIS STATE U NEW Y
[4]   Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? [J].
Bailey, TM ;
Hahn, U .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2001, 44 (04) :568-591
[5]  
Brownell R., 2000, RECEPTIVE ONE WORD P
[6]  
Brownell R., 2000, Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test- Spanish Bilingual Edition
[7]  
DEBRUNHOFF L, 1981, BABARS ANNIVERSARY A
[8]   Perception of wordlikeness: Effects of segment probability and length on the processing of nonwords [J].
Frisch, SA ;
Large, NR ;
Pisoni, DB .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2000, 42 (04) :481-496
[9]   Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words [J].
Gaskell, MG ;
Dumay, N .
COGNITION, 2003, 89 (02) :105-132
[10]   Phonotactic influences on short-term memory [J].
Gathercole, SE ;
Frankish, CR ;
Pickering, SJ ;
Peaker, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1999, 25 (01) :84-95