Role of strain imaging for assessment of myocardial viability in symptomatic myocardial infarction with single vessel disease: An observational study

被引:1
|
作者
Bhutani, Mohit [1 ,2 ]
Vatsa, Deepankar [1 ,2 ]
Rahatekar, Parag [1 ,2 ]
Verma, Deepak [1 ,2 ]
Nath, Ranjit K. [1 ,2 ]
Pandit, Neeraj [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Cardiol, New Delhi, India
[2] RML Hosp, New Delhi, India
来源
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES | 2020年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
dobutamine stress echocardiography; myocardial viability; strain imaging; DOBUTAMINE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VELOCITY;
D O I
10.1111/echo.14567
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To study and evaluate the predictive value of strain imaging parameters in patients undergoing viability assessment postmyocardial infarction (MI) in comparison with Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) alone. Methods This was a prospective observational study (October, 2016-March, 2018), which recruited 100 symptomatic patients with MI, and angiographically proven single vessel disease, LV dysfunction with severe hypokinesia/akinesia on 2D echocardiography and viability proven by baseline DSE. Patients undergoing primary PCI were excluded. Patients were recruited in two groups: DSE alone (first group) and strain imaging with DSE (second group). Revascularization was done in all patients. Patients were assessed at 3 months for functional recovery by 2D echocardiography. Results On 3 month follow-up after revascularization, 37 patients (74%) in first group and 33 patients (66.67%) in second group had functional recovery. Dobutamine-stimulated strain parameters such as circumferential strain (CS; P = .005), radial velocity (RV; P < .001), longitudinal strain (LS; P < .001), and longitudinal strain rate (LSR; P < .001) were found to be a significant predictor of viability. The greatest area under the curve (AUC) for the ROC curves was obtained for low dose dobutamine RV (AUC = 0.92), low dose dobutamine LS (AUC = 0.94), and low dose dobutamine LSR (AUC = 0.88). Positive predictive value of the combination of low dose DSE with strain parameters (RV-97.2%, LS-97.4%, and LSR-87.5%) for myocardial viability was significantly higher than low dose DSE positive/low dose strain parameters negative patients as well as low dose DSE group alone. Conclusion Evaluation of strain parameters with low dose DSE is clinically feasible for the detection of myocardial viability and adds incremental value to the subjective and semiquantitative wall-motion scoring. LS at low dose DSE with WMSI was found to have the highest positive predictive value.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 61
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of myocardial viability using echocardiographic strain imaging in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparison with cardiac PET imaging
    Sharma, Ambudhar
    Sood, Ashwani
    Mittal, Bhagwant Rai
    Vijayvergiya, Rajesh
    JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2020, 18 (04) : 240 - 252
  • [2] Assessment of myocardial viability using echocardiographic strain imaging in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparison with cardiac PET imaging
    Ambudhar Sharma
    Ashwani Sood
    Bhagwant Rai Mittal
    Rajesh Vijayvergiya
    Journal of Echocardiography, 2020, 18 : 240 - 252
  • [3] Bedside Assessment of Myocardial Viability Using Transmural Strain Profile in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Comparison With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Tanimoto, Takashi
    Imanishi, Toshio
    Tanaka, Atsushi
    Yamano, Takashi
    Kitabata, Hironori
    Takarada, Shigeho
    Kubo, Takashi
    Takemoto, Kazushi
    Nakamura, Nobuo
    Hirata, Kumiko
    Mizukoshi, Masato
    Akasaka, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2009, 22 (09) : 1015 - 1021
  • [4] Comparative Analysis of Myocardial Viability Multimodality Imaging in Patients with Previous Myocardial Infarction and Symptomatic Heart Failure
    Kazakauskaite, Egle
    Vajauskas, Donatas
    Unikaite, Ruta
    Jonauskiene, Ieva
    Virbickiene, Agneta
    Zaliaduonyte, Diana
    Lapinskas, Tomas
    Jurkevicius, Renaldas
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (03):
  • [5] Assessment of myocardial viability by nuclear imaging techniques
    Bax J.J.
    Poldermans D.
    Elhendy A.
    Boersma E.
    van der Wall E.E.
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2005, 7 (2) : 124 - 129
  • [6] Tissue velocity imaging during dobutamine stimulation for assessment of myocardial viability: Segmental analysis in patients after myocardial infarction
    Schneider, Carsten
    Bahlmann, Edda
    Malisius, Rainer
    Hertting, Klaus
    Antz, Matthias
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 110 (01) : 15 - 21
  • [7] Assessment of myocardial viability by radionuclide imaging
    Giubbini, R
    Milan, E
    Terzi, A
    Pieri, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 65 : S65 - S68
  • [8] Assessment of myocardial viability by MR imaging
    Sandstede, JJW
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [9] NITRATE-AUGMENTED MYOCARDIAL IMAGING FOR ASSESSMENT OF MYOCARDIAL VIABILITY
    HE, ZX
    VERANI, MS
    LIU, XJ
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 2 (04) : 352 - 357
  • [10] Role of Echocardiography in the Assessment of Myocardial Viability
    McLean, Dalton S.
    Anadiotis, Athanasios V.
    Lerakis, Stamatios
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 337 (05) : 349 - 354