Monitoring the Quality of Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Lumbar Spine by Using a Cumulative Summation Test

被引:103
|
作者
Kim, Ho-Joong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Seung Hoo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chang, Bong-Soon [2 ,4 ]
Lee, Choon-Ki [2 ,4 ]
Lim, Teck Onn [5 ]
Hoo, Ling Ping [6 ]
Yi, Je-Min [7 ]
Yeom, Jin S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Spine Ctr, Songnam 463707, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Songnam 463707, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Songnam 463707, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[5] ClinRes Sdn Bhd, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
[6] Stats Consulting Sdn Bhd, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
[7] Kangwon Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Gangwon Do, South Korea
关键词
robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation; cumulative summation; freehand technique; posterior lumbar interbody fusion; PLACEMENT ACCURACY; LEARNING-CURVE; RISK; PERFORMANCE; NAVIGATION; INSERTION; SURGERY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000000680
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Prospective randomized controlled trial. Objective. The aim of this study was to monitor the quality control of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation accuracy by using a cumulative summation (CUSUM) test at the initial stage of its application. Summary of Background Data. Although robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation reduces screw misplacement rates and provides critical support for minimally invasive surgical procedures, there have been no reports relating to the monitoring of quality control of the accuracy of this robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation procedure. Methods. Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis scheduled to undergo surgery were randomly and equally assigned through 1:1 allocation to a robot-assisted minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (Rom-PLIF) group or a conventional open posterior PLIF using freehand technique group. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was evaluated using postoperative computed tomography. The primary outcome was the CUSUM analysis for monitoring the quality control of the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion between the Rom-PLIF and conventional open posterior PLIF using freehand technique groups. Results. Of the 80 pedicle screws inserted in each group, 4 screws in the Rom-PLIF group, and 7 in the conventional open PLIF group, breached the pedicle. Of these 11 offending screws, 4 cases were categorized as grade B in the Rom-PLIF group, whereas 6 were grade B and 1 case was grade C in the Com-PLIF group, using the Gertzbein and Robbins classification. Throughout the monitoring period, there was no CUSUM test-derived indication that the quality of performance of the pedicle screw fixation procedure was inadequate in either group. Conclusion. First, this study demonstrates the adequacy of quality control of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation even early in the application period based on the CUSUM analysis. Second, the CUSUM test can be a useful tool for monitoring of the quality of procedures related with spine surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 94
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery
    Kim, Ho-Joong
    Jung, Whan-Ik
    Chang, Bong-Soon
    Lee, Choon-Ki
    Kang, Kyoung-Tak
    Yeom, Jin S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (03)
  • [2] The safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for spine disease A META-ANALYSIS
    Li, W.
    Li, G.
    Chen, W.
    Cong, L.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (10): : 653 - 666
  • [3] Learning curves of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixations based on the cumulative sum test
    Yu, Jie
    Zhang, Qi
    Fan, Ming-Xing
    Han, Xiao-Guang
    Liu, Bo
    Tian, Wei
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (33) : 10134 - 10142
  • [4] Effect of Robot-Assisted Surgery on Lumbar Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation in Patients with Osteoporosis
    Feng, Shuo
    Tian, Wei
    Sun, Yuqing
    Liu, Yajun
    Wei, Yi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 125 : E1057 - E1062
  • [5] Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement
    Schwendner, Maximilian
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2023, 35 (01): : 37 - 42
  • [6] Robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery - a systematic review and a meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Yu, Lingjia
    Chen, Xi
    Margalit, Adam
    Peng, Huiming
    Qiu, Guixing
    Qian, Wenwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2018, 14 (03)
  • [7] Risk factors for robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw malposition
    Zhang, Jia Nan
    Fan, Yong
    Hao, Ding Jun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [8] Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement for Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Comparative Cohort Study
    Yang, Jun-Song
    He, Baorong
    Tian, Fang
    Liu, Tuan-Jiang
    Liu, Peng
    Zhang, Jia-Nan
    Liu, Shi-Chang
    Tuo, Yuan
    Chu, Lei
    Hao, Ding-Jun
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2019, 25 : 2479 - 2487
  • [9] Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison
    Schatlo, Bawarjan
    Molliqaj, Granit
    Cuvinciuc, Victor
    Kotowski, Marc
    Schaller, Karl
    Tessitore, Enrico
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 20 (06) : 636 - 643
  • [10] Freehand pedicle screw fixation: A safe recipe for dorsal, lumbar and sacral spine
    Junaid, Muhammad
    Afzal, Ali
    Kalsoom, Anisa
    Bukhari, Syed Sarmad
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 35 (03) : 680 - 684