Life cycle assessment of biocemented sands using enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) for soil stabilization applications

被引:33
作者
Alotaibi, Emran [1 ,2 ]
Arab, Mohamed G. [1 ,3 ]
Abdallah, Mohamed [1 ]
Nassif, Nadia [1 ,2 ]
Omar, Maher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sharjah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, POB 27272, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Univ Sharjah, Res Inst Sci & Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[3] Mansoura Univ, Struct Engn Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
BEHAVIOR; CEMENTATION; EMISSIONS; EROSION; AMMONIA; IMPACT; MICP;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-09723-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Integrating sustainability goals into the selection of suitable soil stabilization techniques is a global trend. Several bio-inspired and bio-mediated soil stabilization techniques have been recently investigated as sustainable alternatives for traditional techniques known for their high carbon footprint. Enzyme Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP) is an emerging bio-inspired soil stabilization technology that is based on the hydrolysis of urea to precipitate carbonates that cement sand particles. A life cycle assessment (LCA) study was conducted to compare the use of traditional soil stabilization using Portland cement (PC) with bio-cementation via EICP over a range of environmental impacts. The LCA results revealed that EICP soil treatment has nearly 90% less abiotic depletion potential and 3% less global warming potential compared to PC in soil stabilization. In contrast, EICP in soil stabilization has higher acidification and eutrophication potentials compared to PC due to byproducts during the hydrolysis process. The sensitivity analysis of EICP emissions showed that reducing and controlling the EICP process emissions and using waste non-fate milk has resulted in significantly fewer impacts compared to the EICP baseline scenario. Moreover, a comparative analysis was conducted between EICP, PC, and Microbial Induced Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) to study the effect of treated soil compressive strength on the LCA findings. The analysis suggested that EICP is potentially a better environmental option, in terms of its carbon footprint, at lower compressive strength of the treated soils.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Comparative life cycle assessment of anaerobic co-digestion for dairy waste management in large-scale farms [J].
Adghim, Mohamad ;
Abdallah, Mohamed ;
Saad, Suhair ;
Shanableh, Abdallah ;
Sartaj, Majid ;
El Mansouri, Ahmed Eltigani .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 256
[2]  
Al-Thawadi S., 2008, PhD thesis
[3]   Enzyme-Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP)-Based methods for ecofriendly stabilization of different types of natural sands [J].
Almajed, Abdullah ;
Abbas, Husain ;
Arab, Mohamed ;
Alsabhan, Abdullah ;
Hamid, Wagdi ;
Al-Salloum, Yousef .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 274
[4]   Mitigating wind erosion of sand using biopolymer-assisted EICP technique [J].
Almajed, Abdullah ;
Lemboye, Kehinde ;
Arab, Mohamed G. ;
Alnuaim, Ahmed .
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2020, 60 (02) :356-371
[5]   Enzyme Induced Biocementated Sand with High Strength at Low Carbonate Content [J].
Almajed, Abdullah ;
Tirkolaei, Hamed Khodadadi ;
Kavazanjian, Edward, Jr. ;
Hamdan, Nasser .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
[6]  
Arab M. G, 2019, P 4 WORLD C CIV STRU
[7]   One-Phase EICP Biotreatment of Sand Exposed to Various Environmental Conditions [J].
Arab, Mohamed G. ;
Rohy, Haider ;
Zeiada, Waleed ;
Almajed, Abduallah ;
Omar, Maher .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 33 (03)
[8]   Assessing the potential of utilization and storage strategies for post-combustion CO2 emissions reduction [J].
Armstrong, Katy ;
Styring, Peter .
FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 3 (MAR)
[9]   Life cycle analysis of environmental impact vs. durability of stabilised rammed earth [J].
Arrigoni, Alessandro ;
Beckett, Christopher ;
Ciancio, Daniela ;
Dotelli, Giovanni .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2017, 142 :128-136
[10]  
Calvo Buendia E., 2019, REFINEMENT 2006 IPCC