Visualization of neonatal coronary arteries on multidetector row CT: ECG-gated versus non-ECG-gated technique

被引:58
作者
Tsai, I-Chen
Lee, Tain
Chen, Min-Chi
Fu, Yun-Ching
Jan, Sheng-Lin
Wang, Chung-Chi
Chang, Yen
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taichung 407, Taiwan
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ, Coll Med, Fac Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Dept Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[5] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Pediat, Sect Paediat Cardiol, Taichung, Taiwan
[6] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Cardiovasc Surg Sect, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
multidetector CT; coronary arteries; neonates;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-007-0512-3
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background Multidetector CT (MDCT) seems to be a promising tool for detection of neonatal coronary arteries, but whether the ECG-gated or non-ECG-gated technique should be used has not been established. Objective To compare the detection rate and image quality of neonatal coronary arteries on MDCT using ECG-gated and non-ECG-gated techniques. Materials and methods Twelve neonates with complex congenital heart disease were included. The CT scan was acquired using an ECG-gated technique, and the most quiescent phase of the RR interval was selected to represent the ECG-gated images. The raw data were then reconstructed without the ECG signal to obtain non-ECG-gated images. The detection rate and image quality of nine coronary artery segments in the two sets of images were then compared. A two-tailed paired t test was used with P values < 0.05 considered as statistically significant. Results In all coronary segments the ECG-gated technique had a better detection rate and produced images of better quality. The difference between the two techniques ranged from 25% in the left main coronary artery to 100% in the distal right coronary artery. Conclusion For neonates referred for MDCT, if evaluation of coronary artery anatomy is important for the clinical management or surgical planning, the ECG-gated technique should be used because it can reliably detect the coronary arteries.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 825
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging of complex congenital cardiovascular abnormalities [J].
Bean, MJ ;
Pannu, H ;
Fishman, EK .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2005, 29 (06) :721-724
[2]   Arterial switch operations for single coronary artery ostium or intramural coronary artery [J].
Cetin, G ;
Tireli, E ;
Ozkara, A ;
Koner, O ;
Soyler, I ;
Saltik, L ;
Babaoglu, K .
CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2004, 68 (12) :1179-1183
[3]   Coronary reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction can yield better result in arterial switch operation: Comparison with open trap door technique [J].
Chang, YH ;
Sung, SC ;
Lee, HD ;
Kim, S ;
Woo, JS ;
Lee, YS .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 80 (05) :1634-1640
[4]   Interrupted aortic arch in a neonate: multidetector CT diagnosis [J].
Cinar, A ;
Haliloglu, M ;
Karagoz, T ;
Karcaaltincaba, M ;
Celiker, A ;
Tekinalp, G .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 34 (11) :901-903
[5]  
Coche E, 2006, Heart, V92, P1193, DOI 10.1136/hrt.2005.084194
[6]   Diagnosis of a coronary artery anomaly by 16-channel computed tomography coronary angiography in an infant [J].
Dogan, O. F. ;
Guvener, M. ;
Demircin, M. ;
Karcaaltincaba, M. ;
Duman, U. .
PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 27 (05) :658-659
[7]   Pediatric thoracic CT angiography [J].
Frush, DP ;
Herlong, JR .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 35 (01) :11-25
[8]   Pictorial essay. Multidetector CT evaluation of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. [J].
Gilkeson, RC ;
Ciancibello, L ;
Zahka, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 180 (04) :973-980
[9]   CT of congenital heart disease: Normal anatomy and typical pathologic conditions [J].
Goo, HW ;
Park, IS ;
Ko, JK ;
Kim, YH ;
Seo, DM ;
Yun, TJ ;
Park, JJ ;
Yoon, CH .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2003, 23 :S147-S165
[10]   Computed tomography for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients [J].
Goo, HW ;
Park, IS ;
Ko, JK ;
Kim, YH ;
Seo, DM ;
Park, JJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2005, 21 (2-3) :347-365