Could social interaction reduce the disposition effect? Evidence from retail investors in a directed social trading network

被引:4
作者
Jin, Xuejun [1 ]
Li, Rui [1 ]
Zhu, Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Econ, Dept Finance, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Utah, David Eccles Sch Business, Dept Operat & Informat Syst, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
STOCK OPINIONS; UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE; DECISIONS; WISDOM; CROWDS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0246759
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
With data collected from a directed social trading network, this paper investigates how social interaction affects the disposition effect. We constantly observe a negative association between them: After being exposed to social interaction, a trader's odds ratio to sell a paper gain stock decreases by 9% to 10%, depending on different model settings. We then test the mechanisms of social interaction by decomposing it into three channels: learning intensity (willingness to learn), learning quality (information advantage through learning), and public scrutinization (exposure of trading outcome to others). We find that all three channels contribute to a smaller disposition effect. Specifically, our findings support the claim that public scrutinization promotes self-consciousness and reduces disposition effect. Also, our results extend previous studies on investors' information advantage by suggesting that it could also help to mitigate the disposition effect through the reduction of uncertainty. Overall, this paper suggests a positive role of social trading platforms in helping investors make better decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [11] Effects of transparency: analyzing social biases on trader performance in social trading
    Glaser, Florian
    Risius, Marten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 33 (01) : 19 - 30
  • [12] A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions
    Hajli, Nick
    Sims, Julian
    Zadeh, Arash H.
    Richard, Marie-Odile
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 71 : 133 - 141
  • [13] Peer Pressure: Social Interaction and the Disposition Effect
    Heimer, Rawley Z.
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2016, 29 (11) : 3177 - 3209
  • [14] Factor price uncertainty, technology choice and investment delay
    Kaboski, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2005, 29 (03) : 509 - 525
  • [15] PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK
    KAHNEMAN, D
    TVERSKY, A
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) : 263 - 291
  • [16] NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS
    KAPLAN, EL
    MEIER, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) : 457 - 481
  • [17] Lei Feng, 2005, Review of Finance, V9, P305, DOI 10.1007/s10679-005-2262-0
  • [18] Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making analysis
    Lipshitz, R
    Strauss, O
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 69 (02) : 149 - 163
  • [19] Prospect Theory for Online Financial Trading
    Liu, Yang-Yu
    Nacher, Jose C.
    Ochiai, Tomoshiro
    Martino, Mauro
    Altshuler, Yaniv
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [20] Lukas M, 2018, BEH DEC RES MAN C