Land-use Decisions in Complex Commons: Engaging Multiple Stakeholders through Foresight and Scenario Building in Indonesia

被引:12
作者
Shantiko, Bayuni [1 ]
Liswanti, Nining [1 ]
Bourgeois, Robin [2 ,3 ]
Laumonier, Yves [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Int Forestry Res CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia
[2] CIRAD, UMR ART DEV, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Perpignan Via Domitia, Univ Montpellier 3, Univ Montpellier, ART DEV,CIRAD,CNRS, Montpellier, France
[4] Ctr Cooperat Int Rech Agron Dev CIRAD, Forets & Soc UR105, Montpellier, France
关键词
Foresight; Participatory prospective analysis; Scenario planning; Multistakeholder processes; Land-use planning; Indonesia; ALTERNATIVE FUTURES; GOVERNANCE; DEFORESTATION; PLAUSIBILITY; CHALLENGES; CONFLICT; LESSONS; DESIGN; ISSUES; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-021-01470-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the midst of global change uncertainties, Indonesian spatial planning authorities are developing 20-year strategies. However, the lack of collaborative engagement of stakeholders and unclear methodology around using futures studies in addressing land management undermine such plans and affect environmental governance. A crucial question is how to link a future-oriented process with governance transformation processes, particularly related to land-use planning and management. To address this issue, we used a co-elaborative scenario-building approach, referred to as participatory prospective analysis (PPA), to facilitate the creation of local multistakeholder platforms considering future-oriented perspectives. The PPA design combines equally the knowledge of local communities, technical experts and decision-makers, and was applied in a series of sequential multistakeholder workshops in two regencies in Indonesia, followed by public consultations on the main results. In both regencies, participants agreed on a common topic related to spatial planning in their jurisdiction to be explored with a 20-year time horizon. They reached consensus on relevant variables, analyzed their dependence/influence, and developed several plausible yet contrasting scenarios for land management and road maps with guidelines for the implementation of desired outcomes. The PPA approach stimulated stakeholder engagement and ensured that more local voices were not only heard but also duly included in the process. It allowed participants to consider strategies that would otherwise have been less readily accepted by their respective organizations. It showed that it is possible to improve existing spatial planning processes in Indonesia by integrating tools for a more inclusive and long-term future-oriented collaborative approach.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 664
页数:23
相关论文
共 130 条
  • [1] Oil palm-community conflict mapping in Indonesia: A case for better community liaison in planning for development initiatives
    Abram, Nicola K.
    Meijaard, Erik
    Wilson, Kerrie A.
    Davis, Jacqueline T.
    Wells, Jessie A.
    Ancrenaz, Marc
    Budiharta, Sugeng
    Durrant, Alexandra
    Fakhruzzi, Afif
    Runting, Rebecca K.
    Gaveau, David
    Mengersen, Kerrie
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 78 : 33 - 44
  • [2] ADB-MoEF, 2018, FOR INV PROGR 1 2018
  • [3] Emerging pathways for critical futures research: Changing contexts and impacts of social theory
    Ahlqvist, Toni
    Rhisiart, Martin
    [J]. FUTURES, 2015, 71 : 91 - 104
  • [4] AMAN, 2018, WIL AD MAS DIAB DUK
  • [5] A review of scenario planning
    Amer, Muhammad
    Daim, Tugrul U.
    Jetter, Antonie
    [J]. FUTURES, 2013, 46 : 23 - 40
  • [6] Anandi A.M., 2020, OPERATIONALIZING INT
  • [7] Green growth rhetoric versus reality: Insights from Indonesia
    Anderson, Zachary R.
    Kusters, Koen
    McCarthy, John
    Obidzinski, Krystof
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2016, 38 : 30 - 40
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2015, WHAT WORKS CASE STUD
  • [9] Ardiansyah F., 2015, 132 CIFOR
  • [10] Landscape Approaches: A State-of-the-Art Review
    Arts, Bas
    Buizer, Marleen
    Horlings, Lummina
    Ingram, Verina
    van Oosten, Cora
    Opdam, Paul
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 42, 2017, 42 : 439 - 463